Qualcomm, Inc


	x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


	o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days. Yes x No o

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the close of business on July 23, 2002:

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by QUALCOMM Incorporated (the Company or QUALCOMM), without audit, in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not necessarily include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2001, as adjusted (Note 8), was derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet at that date which is not presented herein. The Company operates and reports using a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the last Sunday in September. As a result, the three months and nine months periods ended June 30, 2002 included 13 weeks and 39 weeks, respectively, as compared to 13 weeks and 40 weeks for the three months and nine months periods ended July 1, 2001.

In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial information for the interim periods presented reflects all adjustments, which are only normal and recurring, necessary for a fair presentation. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of operating results for an entire fiscal year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and the disclosure of contingent amounts in the Company’s financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

During the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2002, the Company recognized $16 million and $51 million, respectively, in income before income taxes and accounting changes, as compared to $21 million and $70 million for the three months and nine months ended July 1, 2001, respectively, related to revenue and expense recognized in prior years as a result of the adoption of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101), “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,” as of the beginning of fiscal 2001. The statements of operations for the three months and nine months ended July 1, 2001, and the statement of cash flows for the nine months ended July 1, 2001 have been adjusted to reflect the adoption of this standard.

Basic net earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net earnings per common share (diluted EPS) for the three months ended June 30, 2002 excluded the potential dilutive effect, calculated using the treasury stock method, of 35,809,000 additional common shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options due to their anti-dilutive effect as a result of the Company’s loss before accounting changes. Diluted EPS for the nine months ended June 30, 2002 reflected the potential dilutive effect, calculated using the treasury stock method, of 40,505,000 additional common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options. The diluted base for the three months and nine months ended July 1, 2001 excluded the potential dilutive effect, calculated using the treasury stock method, of 48,852,000 and 52,544,000 additional common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, respectively, due to their anti-dilutive effect as a result of the Company’s loss before accounting changes.

Options outstanding during the three months ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001 to purchase approximately 47,570,000 and 18,994,000 shares of common stock, respectively, and options outstanding during the nine months ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001 to purchase approximately 37,995,000 and 12,680,000 shares of common stock, respectively, were not included in the treasury stock computation because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common stock during the period, and therefore, the effect on diluted EPS would be anti-dilutive.

During the three months ended June 30, 2002, unrealized losses on marketable securities, net of income taxes, included $82 million related to declines in the market values of investments in Leap Wireless International Inc. (Leap Wireless). The reclassification adjustment for other-than-temporary losses on marketable securities results from the recognition of unrealized losses in the statement of operations resulting from declines in the market prices of those securities deemed to be other than temporary. During the three months ended June 30, 2002, the reclassification adjustment for other-than-temporary losses on marketable securities related to losses on investments in Leap Wireless reclassified to the statement of operations. The reclassification adjustment for net realized gains results from the recognition of the net realized gains in the

statement of operations when the marketable securities are sold. The reclassification adjustment for losses included in the accounting change results from the recognition of unrealized losses attributable to derivative instruments as of the beginning of fiscal 2001 in the statement of operations as a result of the implementation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (FAS 133), “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” Unrealized losses on certain derivative instruments subject to FAS 133 were previously recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (FAS 141), “Business Combinations,” and No. 142 (FAS 142), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” FAS 141 supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 16, “Business Combinations.” The provisions of FAS 141 (1) require that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, (2) provide specific criteria for the initial recognition and measurement of intangible assets apart from goodwill, and (3) require that unamortized negative goodwill be written off immediately as an extraordinary gain instead of being deferred and amortized. FAS 141 also requires that, upon adoption of FAS 142, the Company reclassify the carrying amounts of certain intangible assets into or out of goodwill, based on certain criteria. FAS 142 supersedes APB 17, “Intangible Assets,” and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. FAS 142 primarily addresses the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to their initial recognition. The provisions of FAS 142 (1) prohibit the amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, (2) require that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets be tested annually for impairment (and in interim periods if certain events occur indicating that the carrying value of goodwill and/or indefinite-lived intangible assets may be impaired), (3) require that reporting units be identified for the purpose of assessing potential impairments of goodwill, and (4) remove the forty-year limitation on the amortization period of intangible assets that have finite lives.

FAS 142 requires that goodwill be tested annually for impairment using a two-step process. The first step (Step 1) is to identify a potential impairment and, in transition, this step must be measured as of the beginning of the fiscal year. However, a company has six months from the date of adoption to complete this step. The second step of the goodwill impairment test measures the amount of the impairment loss (measured as of the beginning of the year of adoption), if any, and must be completed by the end of fiscal 2003. Any impairment loss resulting from the transitional impairment tests would be reflected as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the first quarter 2003.

The Company will adopt the provisions of FAS 142 in its first quarter of fiscal 2003. The Company has determined its reporting units and the amounts of goodwill, intangible assets, other assets and liabilities allocable to those reporting units and expects to complete Step 1 in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. During the third quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company performed a preliminary Step 1 analysis. The Company will finalize its Step 1 analysis as of the date of adoption. Based on its preliminary Step 1 analysis, the Company does not expect the adoption of FAS 142 to have a material impact on its financial position. The Company will no longer record goodwill amortization starting in fiscal 2003. The Company recorded $62 million and $184 million in goodwill amortization expense during the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2002, respectively.

Events and Transactions.” FAS 144 also resolves significant implementation issues related to FAS 121. Companies are required to adopt FAS 144 for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, but early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt FAS 144 as of the beginning of fiscal 2003. The Company does not expect the adoption of FAS 144 to have a material impact on its operating results and financial position.

Marketable securities are comprised of certificates of deposit, commercial paper, U.S. government securities, corporate bonds, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities and equity securities that are publicly traded. During the second quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company allocated $300 million to institutional portfolio managers for investment in a diversified portfolio of non-investment grade securities, and at June 30, 2002, that amount was fully invested, primarily in corporate bonds with credit ratings of B/B2 and BB/Ba2.

Management determines the appropriate classification of marketable securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Trading and available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value as determined by the most recently traded price of each security at the balance sheet date. Changes in fair value associated with trading securities are recorded in the statement of operations. Net unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities are reported as a component of comprehensive income (loss).

In February 2000, the Company purchased 308,000 units of Leap Wireless’ senior discount notes with detachable warrants for $150 million. The notes mature in April 2010 and bear interest at 14.5% payable beginning in 2005. In addition, the Company holds 489,000 shares of Leap Wireless’ stock at June 30, 2002. During the third quarter of fiscal 2002, management determined that declines in the market values of the Company’s investments in Leap Wireless were other than temporary. As a result, the Company recorded $150 million and $17 million in other-than-temporary losses on marketable securities for the notes and stock, respectively, during the third quarter of fiscal 2002. The Company also recorded $27 million and $56 million in losses related to changes in the fair values of Leap Wireless derivative investments for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2002 (Note 4). The remaining recorded values of Leap Wireless investments totaled $17 million at June 30, 2002, including $3 million in derivative instruments. Under the terms of the senior credit facility with Leap Wireless, the Company is committed to fund up to $125 million in connection with Leap Wireless’ bid for PCS spectrum in the FCC’s Auction No. 35 (Note 7).

At June 30, 2002, trade accounts receivable and the allowance for doubtful accounts included $114 million and $74 million, respectively, related to the consolidation of Vesper Holding Ltd. (Vesper Holding) (Note 8).

Finance receivables result from arrangements in which the Company has agreed to provide its customers or certain Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) customers of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson) with long-term interest bearing debt financing for the purchase of equipment and/or services. Finance receivables were comprised as follows:

Gross finance receivables and the allowance for doubtful accounts decreased during the nine months ended June 30, 2002 primarily as a result of the write-off of $622 million in finance receivables from Globalstar L.P. which were fully reserved.

At June 30, 2002, remaining commitments to extend long-term financing by the Company to certain CDMA customers of Ericsson totaled approximately $473 million. The commitment to fund $346 million of this amount expires on November 6, 2003. The funding of the remaining $127 million, if it occurs, is not subject to a fixed expiration date. The financing commitments are subject to the CDMA customers meeting conditions prescribed in the financing arrangements and, in certain cases, to Ericsson also financing a portion of such sales and services. This financing is generally collateralized by the related equipment. Commitments represent the maximum amounts to be financed under these arrangements; actual financing may be in lesser amounts.

Property, plant and equipment increased during the nine months ended June 30, 2002 primarily as a result of the acquisition of Vesper Holding (Note 8).

At June 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001, goodwill is presented net of $571 million and $389 million in accumulated amortization, respectively. During fiscal 2002, the Company acquired intangible assets, including wireless licenses, as a result of its acquisitions (Note 8). At June 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001, intangible assets totaled $197 million and $121 million, respectively, net of accumulated amortization of $40 million and $21 million, respectively.

On November 29, 2001, the Company forgave $119 million under its debt facility with VeloCom, Inc. (VeloCom), an investor in Vesper Holding (Note 8) and converted its remaining $56 million convertible promissory note into equity securities of VeloCom (the VeloCom exchange) in conjunction with its acquisition of Vesper Holding. The VeloCom exchange increased the Company’s equity interest in VeloCom to 49.9%. The Company uses the equity method to account for its investment in VeloCom.

In December 2001, QUALCOMM agreed to invest up to $200 million in exchange for up to 4% of the common shares of Reliance Infocomm Limited (RIL), formerly Reliance Communications Limited, a wireless carrier in India. RIL intends to construct and operate a CDMA commercial network deploying CDMA2000 1X technology to provide basic telephone services, Wireless Local Loop (WLL) with limited mobility and national long distance services in India. At June 30, 2002, because certain conditions precedent under the agreement had not been satisfied, the Company’s obligation to make this investment had become non-binding. However, QUALCOMM retains the option to purchase the shares contingent upon RIL’s completion of certain performance milestones. Funding would occur through September 2003 if the Company completes the investment. At June 30, 2002, QUALCOMM had not purchased any shares related to this agreement.

In October 2000, the Company agreed to invest $200 million in the convertible preferred shares of Inquam Limited (Inquam). Inquam was formed to acquire, own, develop and manage wireless communications systems, either directly or indirectly, with the primary intent of deploying CDMA-based technology. In addition, QUALCOMM advanced $10 million under a promissory note that matured on January 31, 2002. In April 2002, Inquam used equity funding from QUALCOMM to repay the promissory note. At June 30, 2002, $49 million of the equity funding commitment was outstanding. The Company expects to fund the remaining commitment through December 2002.

On June 3, 2002, Wingcast, LLC (Wingcast), a joint venture created by Ford Motor Company and QUALCOMM to provide telematics services, initiated liquidation through an assignment for the benefit of creditors. Ford Motor Company had been the sole contributor of funding to Wingcast since May 2001. QUALCOMM had previously invested $25 million in exchange for an approximate 15% equity stake in Wingcast. As a result of the dissolution of Wingcast, the Company recorded a realized loss of $9 million to write off its remaining investment in Wingcast during the third quarter of fiscal 2002 (Note 4).

Funding commitments related to other investments totaled $32 million at June 30, 2002, which the Company expects to fund through fiscal 2009. Such commitments are subject generally to the investees meeting certain conditions; actual equity funding may be in lesser amounts.

The Company currently estimates its annual effective income tax rate to be approximately 27% for fiscal 2002. This rate differs from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to the partial reversal of the deferred tax valuation allowance that was previously charged to expense, the impact of nondeductible goodwill amortization, earnings and losses outside the United States and research and development credits. The prior fiscal year rate of negative 25% was the result of pre-tax losses for which it was more likely than not the Company would not receive a tax benefit and foreign expense. The expected annual effective tax rate on profits for fiscal 2002 cannot be meaningfully compared to the effective tax rate on losses for the prior fiscal year.

The Company is organized on the basis of products and services. During the first quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company formed two new operating segments, QUALCOMM Wireless & Internet and QUALCOMM Strategic Initiatives, as a result of changes in the Company’s businesses and in managerial reporting. Three segments have been aggregated into the QUALCOMM Wireless & Internet segment. Reportable segments are as follows:


	•	QUALCOMM CDMA Technologies (QCT) — develops and supplies CDMA-based integrated circuits and system software for wireless voice and data communications and global positioning products;

	•	QUALCOMM Technology Licensing (QTL) — licenses third parties to design, manufacture, and sell products incorporating the Company’s CDMA technology;

	•	QUALCOMM Wireless & Internet (QWI) — comprised of:


	-	QUALCOMM Internet Services (QIS) — provides solutions for wireless service providers, handset manufacturers and wireless application developers as the industry moves toward wireless convergence through the Company’s complete BREW solution, which includes a software development kit, an open application platform for wireless handsets, and a distribution, billing and payment system;

	-	QUALCOMM Digital Media (QDM) — develops technologies to support the processing, transmission and management of content for a variety of media applications, including the delivery of digitized motion pictures (Digital Cinema) and highly secure, wireless products for the United States government; and

	-	QUALCOMM Wireless Business Solutions (QWBS) — provides satellite and terrestrial-based two-way data messaging and position reporting services to transportation companies and private fleets.


	•	QUALCOMM Strategic Initiatives (QSI) — manages the Company’s strategic investment activities. QSI makes strategic investments to promote the worldwide adoption of CDMA products and services for wireless voice and Internet data communications, including CDMA carriers and licensed device manufacturers and companies that support the design and introduction of new CDMA-based products or possess unique capabilities or technology. QSI also provides financing to CDMA carriers to facilitate the marketing and sale of CDMA equipment by licensed manufacturers.

The Wireless Systems division, which has contracts with Globalstar L.P. to design, develop and manufacture subscriber products and ground telecommunications equipment, is no longer included in a reportable segment, and the division’s revenues and losses are presented with other products in reconciling items.

The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on earnings before income taxes and accounting changes (EBT), excluding certain impairment and other charges that are not allocated to the segments for management reporting purposes. EBT includes the allocation of certain corporate expenses to the segments, including depreciation and amortization expense related to unallocated corporate assets. Segment data includes intersegment revenues.

Segment results presented for the fiscal 2001 period have been restated to conform to the current year segment presentation. The table below presents revenues and EBT for reported segments (in thousands):

Reconciling items in the previous table were comprised as follows (in thousands):

Unallocated corporate expenses included $65 million and $192 million for amortization of goodwill and other acquisition-related intangible assets during the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. Unallocated corporate expenses during the three months and nine months ended July 1, 2001 included $63 million and $188 million for the amortization of goodwill and other acquisition-related intangible assets, respectively. Unallocated corporate expenses during the nine months ended July 1, 2001 also included

$67 million in losses related to the Globalstar business and $69 million in charges related to an arbitration decision against the Company.

Revenues from external customers and intersegment revenues were as follows (in thousands):

Segment assets are comprised of accounts receivable, finance receivables and inventory for QCT, QTL and QWI. The QSI segment assets include marketable securities, accounts receivable, finance receivables, notes receivable, other investments and all assets of Wireless Knowledge and Vesper Holding (Note 8). Total segment assets differ from total assets on a consolidated basis as a result of unallocated corporate assets primarily comprised of cash, cash equivalents, marketable debt securities, property plant and equipment, and goodwill. Segment assets were as follows (in thousands):

The QSI segment assets increased during the nine months ended June 30, 2002 primarily as a result of the acquisition of Vesper Holding (Note 8).

Schwartz, et al v. QUALCOMM: On December 14, 2000, 77 former QUALCOMM employees filed a lawsuit against the Company in the District Court for Boulder County, Colorado, alleging claims for intentional misrepresentation, nondisclosure and concealment, violation of C.R.S. Section 8-2-104 (obtaining workers by misrepresentation), breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, promissory estoppels, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, violation of California Labor Code Section 970, violation of California Civil Code Sections 1709-1710, rescission, violation of California

Business & Professions Code Section 17200 and violation of California Civil Code Section 1575. Since then, 10 other individuals have joined the suit as plaintiffs. On November 29, 2001, the Court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss 17 of the plaintiffs from the lawsuit. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome of the dispute would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results, liquidity or financial position, the Company believes the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend the action.

GTE Wireless Incorporated (GTE) v. QUALCOMM: On June 29, 1999, GTE filed an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia asserting that wireless telephones sold by the Company infringe a single patent allegedly owned by GTE. On September 15, 1999, the Court granted the Company’s motion to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. On February 14, 2002, the District Court granted QUALCOMM’s motion for summary judgment that QUALCOMM’s products did not infringe GTE’s asserted patent and denied GTE’s motion seeking summary judgment on infringement. QUALCOMM’s counterclaims that the patent is invalid or unenforceable remain pending in the District Court and have been stayed while the ruling granting QUALCOMM’s motion and denying GTE’s motion is on appeal. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome of the dispute would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results, liquidity or financial position, the Company believes the action is without merit and will vigorously defend the action.

Durante, et al v. QUALCOMM: On February 2, 2000, three former QUALCOMM employees filed a putative class action against the Company, ostensibly on behalf of themselves and those former employees of the Company whose employment was terminated in April 1999. Virtually all of the purported class of plaintiffs received severance packages at the time of the termination of their employment, in exchange for a release of claims, other than federal age discrimination claims, against the Company. The complaint was filed in California Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles and purports to state ten causes of action including breach of contract, age discrimination, violation of Labor Code Section 200, violation of Labor Code Section 970, unfair business practices, intentional infliction of emotional distress, unjust enrichment, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, declaratory relief and undue influence. The complaint seeks an order accelerating all unvested stock options for the members of the class. On June 27, 2000, the case was ordered transferred from Los Angeles County Superior Court to San Diego County Superior Court. On July 3, 2000, the Company removed the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, and discovery has commenced. On May 29, 2001, the Court dismissed all plaintiffs’ claims except for claims arising under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act. On July 16, 2001, the Court granted conditional class certification on the remaining claims, to be revisited by the Court at the end of the discovery period. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome of the dispute would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results, liquidity or financial position, the Company believes the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend the action.

Zoltar Satellite Alarm Systems, Inc. v. QUALCOMM and SnapTrack: On March 30, 2001, Zoltar Satellite Alarm Systems, Inc. filed suit against QUALCOMM and SnapTrack, a QUALCOMM wholly-owned subsidiary, alleging infringement of three patents. On August 27, 2001, Zoltar filed an amended complaint adding Sprint Corp. as a named defendant and narrowing certain infringement claims against QUALCOMM and SnapTrack. Since then, Zoltar has dismissed Sprint Corp. as a defendant. QUALCOMM and SnapTrack have filed responsive pleadings and discovery has commenced. Trial has been set for February 11, 2003. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome of this dispute would not have a material adverse effect on QUALCOMM’s operating results, liquidity or financial position, QUALCOMM believes the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend the action.

The Company has been named, along with many other manufacturers of wireless handsets, wireless carriers and industry-related organizations, as a defendant in a purported class action lawsuit (In re Wireless Telephone Frequency Emissions Products Liability Litigation, United States District Court for the District of

Maryland), and in several individually filed actions, seeking personal injury, economic and/or punitive damages arising out of its sale of cellular phones. The courts that have reviewed similar claims against other companies to date have held that there was insufficient scientific basis for the plaintiffs’ claims in those cases. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome of these and other disputes would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results, liquidity or financial position, the Company believes the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend the actions.

The Company is engaged in numerous other legal actions arising in the ordinary course of its business and believes that the ultimate outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on its operating results, liquidity or financial position.

The Company consolidates all assets and liabilities of Vesper Holding (Note 8), including bank loans and capital lease commitments. The balances of these loans and commitments at June 30, 2002 were $80 million and $45 million, respectively. The bank loans, which are denominated in Brazilian real, bear interest at the Certificate of Deposit Inter Bank (CDI) rate (the LIBOR rate equivalent in Brazil) plus 1.5% (approximately 18% at June 30, 2002). The lease commitments are subject to interest rates ranging from 11.25% to 14.5%. The aggregate amounts of maturities and minimum lease payments on this debt in each of the next five years from fiscal 2002 through 2006 are $5 million, $15 million, $12 million, $33 million and $60 million, respectively. These debt commitments are collateralized by certain assets of Vesper Holding. The current and long-term portions of these debt commitments are included in other current liabilities and other liabilities, respectively.

The Company leases certain of its facilities and equipment under noncancelable operating leases, with terms ranging from two to ten years and with provisions for cost-of-living increases. Future minimum lease payments in each of the next five years from fiscal 2002 through 2006 are $16 million, $39 million, $28 million, $16 million and $11 million, respectively, and $26 million thereafter.

The Company has a bridge loan facility with Pegaso Comunicaciones y Sistemas S.A. de C.V., a wholly owned subsidiary of Pegaso Telecomunicaciones, S.A. de C.V., a CDMA wireless operating company in Mexico (collectively referred to as Pegaso). The facility was payable in full on October 31, 2001, is in default and is subject to a forbearance agreement. At June 30, 2002, $413 million was outstanding under the bridge loan facility, net of deferred interest and unearned fees. The Company stopped recognizing interest on the bridge loan facility effective at the beginning of the fourth fiscal quarter of 2001.

The Company also provided equipment and related financing to Pegaso. At June 30, 2002, $318 million of this financing was outstanding under the equipment loan facility, net of deferred interest and unearned fees, including $54 million of such financing acquired from Ericsson during the third quarter of fiscal 2002. This financing is currently in default and subject to a forbearance agreement. Pegaso stopped making interest payments on loans outstanding under the equipment loan facility. The Company stopped recognizing interest on these loans effective at the beginning of the fourth fiscal quarter of 2001.

As a result of a series of agreements signed on January 16, 2002 by and among Pegaso’s owners and lenders, including QUALCOMM, the Company agreed to provide $65 million of interim financing to Pegaso, including $5 million in capitalized fees. At June 30, 2002, all $65 million of this interim financing was outstanding. A Pegaso shareholder purchased a $25 million participation from the Company in this financing.

In April 2002, Telefonica Moviles agreed to acquire a 65% controlling interest in Pegaso. The closing of this transaction is dependent on the satisfaction of certain requirements. Regulatory approvals for the sale transaction to Telefonica Moviles have been obtained from COFECO (the Comisión Federal de Competencia of Mexico) with respect to antitrust matters and from CNIE (the Comisión Nacional de Inversiones Extranjeras of Mexico) with regard to foreign ownership matters. Proceedings before COFETEL (the Comisión Federal de Telecomunicaciones of Mexico) and SCT (the Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes of Mexico), the Mexican telecommunications authorities, are still pending. In connection with this acquisition agreement, the interim financing agreement was amended and restated to provide for additional interim financing of up to $140 million to Pegaso on substantially similar terms as the $65 million of initial interim financing. A Pegaso shareholder has committed to purchase a participation of up to $35 million of the first $100 million of this additional interim financing. At June 30, 2002, $24 million of this additional interim financing was outstanding, of which $9 million was purchased as a participation by the Pegaso shareholder.

The $65 million initial interim financing must be repaid in full on the earlier of (i) the date that is 30 days after the Telefonica Moviles acquisition of 65% of Pegaso closes or (ii) the date that agreement is terminated. Interest is payable at 12% unless these interim loans are paid in full within 30 days of the closing date, in which case no interest will be payable. The Company has not recognized interest income on this interim financing.

Loans under the $140 million additional interim financing must be repaid in full on the earlier of (i) the date that is 30 days after the Telefonica Moviles acquisition of 65% of Pegaso closes or (ii) the date that agreement is terminated. The first $100 million of additional interim loans bears interest at LIBOR, and the remaining $40 million bears interest at LIBOR plus 1%, in each case if the additional interim financing is repaid in full within 30 days of the closing date; otherwise, these amounts will bear interest at 12% and 20% respectively. The Company has not recognized interest income on this additional interim financing.

If and when the Telefonica Moviles acquisition of 65% of Pegaso closes, the Company expects to receive approximately $430 million to $445 million in satisfaction of the bridge loan facility within 60 days of the close. The Company would be required to use approximately $140 million of these proceeds to purchase outstanding vendor debt owed by Pegaso to other lenders. The remaining vendor debt due to the Company, including the equipment loan and related financing, will be payable through 2008 and will bear interest at LIBOR plus 1% for two years, LIBOR plus 3% for the next two years and LIBOR plus 6% thereafter.

The Company’s aggregate commitment to provide additional long-term financing to Pegaso under its arrangements with Ericsson (Note 2) remains unchanged at $105 million, subject to Pegaso or a new buyer meeting certain conditions. The Company had $5 million in other financing commitments to Pegaso as of June 30, 2002.

The Company has a commitment to provide $125 million of cash loans under a senior secured credit facility with Leap Wireless to facilitate Leap Wireless’ purchase of licenses in the FCC’s Auction No. 35. At QUALCOMM’s option, and subject to FCC consent, QUALCOMM may transfer all or a portion of any remaining amounts of its Auction Discount Voucher (ADV) in satisfaction of a like dollar amount of such commitment, with a cash commitment equal to any difference between $125 million and the actual amount of the ADV transferred to Leap Wireless. The credit facility may be used by Leap Wireless solely to pay for PCS spectrum licenses acquired in the FCC’s Auction No. 35. Auction No. 35 was completed in January 2001. In Auction No. 35, each of the spectrum licenses as to which Leap Wireless was the highest bidder were licenses the FCC reclaimed from NextWave Telecom, Inc. (NextWave), a company currently in a Chapter 11 reorganization proceeding. The validity of the FCC’s reclamation and reauction of these licenses in Auction

No. 35 is currently subject to litigation between NextWave and the federal government. NextWave has prevailed on certain of its claims in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. In response to a petition by the FCC, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review the case on October 8, 2002. The grant to Leap Wireless of these Auction 35 wireless licenses has been substantially delayed and has been brought into question by the NextWave litigation. As a result, it is unclear when or if Leap Wireless will be able to use the senior credit facility. Under the terms of the credit facility, the Company is committed to fund up to $125 million until the earlier of settlement of the FCC’s Auction No. 35 of PCS spectrum or Leap Wireless’ withdrawal from Auction No. 35. The facility is repayable in a lump sum payment, including principal and interest accrued through October 2002, no later than March 9, 2006. After October 2002, interest is payable semi-annually. The facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 7.5%. At June 30, 2002, no cash had been advanced to Leap Wireless.

In addition to the financing commitments to Pegaso, Leap Wireless and Ericsson (Note 2), the Company had $3 million of letters of credit and $13 million of other financial commitments outstanding as of June 30, 2002, none of which were collateralized.

In fiscal 1999, the Company acquired an approximate 16% ownership interest in Vesper Sao Paulo S.A. and Vesper S.A. (the Vesper Operating Companies). The Vesper Operating Companies were formed by a consortium of investors to provide wireless and wireline telephone services in the northern region of Brazil and in the state of Sao Paulo. In addition, the Company extended long-term financing to the Vesper Operating Companies related to the Company’s financing arrangement with Ericsson (Note 2). On November 13, 2001, QUALCOMM consummated a series of transactions as part of an overall financial restructuring (the Restructuring) of the Vesper Operating Companies.

Pursuant to the Restructuring, the Company and VeloCom (Note 3) committed to invest $266 million and $80 million, respectively, in a newly formed holding company called Vesper Holding. Vesper Holding acquired certain liabilities of the Vesper Operating Companies from their vendors for $135 million and the issuance of warrants to purchase an approximate 7% interest in Vesper Holding, and the vendors released in full any claims that they might have against the Company, VeloCom, the Vesper Operating Companies and other related parties arising from or related to the acquired liabilities. In a series of related transactions, Vesper Holding agreed to contribute the acquired liabilities to the Vesper Operating Companies in exchange for equity securities and to cancel the contributed liabilities. At June 30, 2002, the Company directly owned 72% of the issued and outstanding equity of Vesper Holding, and the Company indirectly owned an additional 11.9% of Vesper Holding through its ownership interest in VeloCom, totaling an 83.9% direct and indirect interest.

The preliminary allocation of the purchase price, based on the estimated fair values of acquired assets and liabilities assumed, reflects $313 million for property, plant and equipment, $39 million for licenses, and $31 million for other intangible assets. The Company is in the process of finalizing the purchase price allocation and has recorded $5 million in net adjustments reducing property, plant and equipment since the acquisition. The Company does not anticipate any additional material adjustments to the allocation. Property, plant and equipment are depreciated over useful lives ranging from 2 to 18 years. Licenses and other intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives of 18 years and 3 to 18 years, respectively.

When the Company obtained its controlling interest in Vesper Holding, Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock,” required that the

Company adjust its prior period results to account for its original 16% ownership interest in the Vesper Operating Companies, predecessors to Vesper Holding, using the equity method of accounting. As a result, the Company recorded $40 million and $106 million of equity in losses of investees for the three months and nine months ended July 1, 2001, respectively, and a $59 million reduction in finance receivables and retained earnings at September 30, 2001. The Company had previously recorded $107 million in asset impairment charges and other-than-temporary losses on other investments during the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Because those charges exceeded the losses recorded as a result of using the equity method, the net loss for the three months and nine months ended July 1, 2001 decreased by $67 million and $1 million, respectively.

Due to the Company’s practice of consolidating foreign subsidiaries one month in arrears, the consolidated financial statements for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2002 included the $35 million and $88 million losses, net of minority interest, respectively, of Vesper Holding from March 1, 2002 through May 31, 2002 and November 13, 2001 to May 31, 2002, respectively. The consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002 also included $7 million and $23 million of equity losses, respectively, related to Vesper Holding (pre-acquisition) and VeloCom. Pro forma operating results for the Company, assuming the acquisition of Vesper Holding had been made at the beginning of the periods presented are as follows (in thousands, except per share data) (unaudited):

These pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and may not be indicative of the results of operations that actually would have occurred had the combination been in effect at the beginning of the respective periods or of future results of operations of the consolidated entities.

During May 2002, the Company acquired the equity interests of certain minority shareholders in its consolidated subsidiary, Corporacion Nacional de Radiodeterminacion, S.A. de C.V. (CNR), the exclusive distributor of the Company’s OmniTRACS product in Mexico, for $24 million. The acquisition increased the Company’s equity ownership in CNR to approximately 97%. The Company used the purchase method to account for this acquisition. The preliminary allocation of purchase price, based on the estimated fair values of acquired assets and liabilities assumed, reflects acquired goodwill and intangible assets of $3 million and $9 million, respectively. The Company is in the process of finalizing the purchase price allocation and does not anticipate material adjustments to the preliminary allocation. In accordance with FAS 142, amounts allocated to goodwill are not amortized. Amounts allocated to intangible assets are being amortized over their expected useful lives.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

This information should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2001 contained in our 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Except for the historical information contained herein, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ substantially from those referred to herein due to a number of factors, including but not limited to risks described in the section entitled Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. Our consolidated financial data includes SnapTrack, Inc. (SnapTrack), Vesper Holding Ltd. (Vesper Holding) and other consolidated subsidiaries.

We design, manufacture and market digital wireless telecommunications products and services based on our CDMA and other technologies. We license and receive royalty payments on our CDMA technology from domestic and international wireless telecommunications equipment suppliers.

We are a leading developer and supplier of CDMA-based integrated circuits and system software for wireless voice and data communications and global positioning system products. We offer complete system solutions including software and integrated circuits for wireless handsets and infrastructure equipment. This complete system solution approach provides customers with advanced wireless technology, enhanced component integration and interoperability, and reduced time to market. We provide integrated circuits and system software to many of the world’s leading wireless handset and infrastructure manufacturers.

We provide satellite and terrestrial-based two-way data messaging and position reporting services for transportation companies and private fleets. We design, manufacture and distribute products and provide services for our OmniTRACS and TruckMAIL (satellite-based mobile communications systems), OmniExpress (terrestrial CDMA-based system) and LINQ (terrestrial GSM-based system) throughout parts of the world. Transportation companies and private fleets use our products to communicate with drivers, monitor vehicle location, provide automated driver logs and fuel tax reporting and provide customer service. We also integrate the mobile data with operations software, such as dispatch, payroll and accounting, so end-users can manage their information and operations.

We provide solutions for wireless service providers, handset manufacturers and wireless application developers as the industry moves toward wireless convergence through the Company’s complete BREW (Binary Runtime Environment for Wireless) solution, which includes a software development kit, an open application platform for wireless handsets, and a distribution, billing and payment system. Our BREW platform is a thin application execution environment that provides an open, standard platform for wireless devices. The BREW platform leverages the capabilities available in our integrated circuits, system software and Wireless Internet Launchpad software, enabling development of feature-rich applications and content while reducing memory overhead and maximizing system performance. BREW is air-interface independent and can also be ported to devices that support other wireless technologies such as GSM/GPRS. In November 2001, KTFreeTel, a leading CDMA carrier in Korea, began commercial service based on BREW. The carrier currently is selling 16 different BREW-enabled handsets in Korea. KTFreeTel’s wireless data service, which includes BREW, runs on a CDMA2000 1X high-speed data network and is available to end users on color display handsets. Verizon Wireless launched service based on BREW in the San Diego market with two BREW-enabled handsets in March 2002 and launched service nationwide in the United States in June 2002. Also, Japan’s KDDI began shipping BREW-based handsets in March. In May 2002, we signed a contract with ALLTEL for BREW-based service. ALLTEL indicated it intends to launch commercial service before the end of 2002. In January 2002, we announced a multi-year licensing agreement with Nextel for our Qchat voice over Internet protocols push-to-talk technology for 3G networks.

We make strategic investments to promote the worldwide adoption of CDMA products and services for wireless voice and Internet data communications. Our strategy is to invest in CDMA carriers, licensed device manufacturers and start-up companies that we believe open new markets for CDMA technology, support the design and introduction of new CDMA-based products or possess unique capabilities or technology. We also provide financing to CDMA carriers to facilitate the marketing and sale of CDMA equipment by licensed manufacturers. We have provided equipment financing to Ericsson on a shared basis with respect to their sale of CDMA infrastructure in Brazil, Mexico and elsewhere. Most of our strategic investments entail a high degree of risk and will not become liquid until more than one year from the date of investment, if at all. To the extent such investments become liquid and meet strategic objectives, we attempt to make regular periodic sales that are recognized in net investment income. In some cases, we consolidate or record our equity in the start-up losses of companies in which we make strategic investments. The consolidation of these losses can adversely affect our financial results until we exit from or reduce our exposure to the investments.

Our discussion and analysis of our results of operations and liquidity and capital resources are based on our consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, adequacy of allowances for doubtful accounts, valuation of intangible assets and investments, income taxes, and litigation. We base our estimates on historical and anticipated results and trends and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, including assumptions as to future events. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. By their nature, estimates are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actual results may differ from our estimates. We believe that the following significant accounting policies and assumptions may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity than others.

We derive revenue principally from royalties, from sales of integrated circuit products, from services and related hardware sales, from software development and related services, and from license fees for intellectual property. The timing of revenue recognition and the amount of revenue actually recognized in each case depends upon a variety of factors, including the specific terms of each arrangement and the nature of our deliverables and obligations. Determination of the appropriate method of revenue recognition involves judgments and estimates that we believe are reasonable, but it is possible that actual results may differ from our estimates.

In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101), “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” which we adopted in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001 and applied retroactively to the first quarter of fiscal 2001. We recognized $16 million and $21 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $51 million and $70 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively, in net income before income taxes and accounting changes related to revenue and expense that was recognized in prior years. We continue to monitor developments in Emerging Issues Task Force discussions of Issue 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” and Issue 02-G, “Recognition of Revenue from Licensing Arrangements on Intellectual Property,” to determine what, if any, impact a final consensus may have on our revenue recognition policy.

Our intellectual property licensees typically pay a non-refundable up-front license fee and on-going royalties on their sales of products incorporating our intellectual property. Prior to the adoption of SAB 101, we generally recorded revenue from intellectual property up-front license fees on the effective date of the applicable license agreement. As a result of the adoption of SAB 101, we generally recognize up-front license fees over the estimated period of future benefit to the licensee, typically five to seven years.

We generally recognize royalty revenue as earned when reasonable estimates of such amounts can be made. Certain royalty revenues are accrued based on estimates prior to the reporting of such revenues by our licensees. Estimates of royalty revenues are based on analyses of historical royalty data by licensee, the relationship between the timing of our sales of integrated circuits to our licensees and our licensees’ sales of CDMA phones and infrastructure equipment, average sales price forecasts, and current market and economic trends. When our licensees report royalties for which we accrued revenues based on estimates, we adjust revenues for the period in which the reports are received.

We generally record revenue from hardware product sales at the time of shipment, or when title and risk of loss passes to the customer, if later. As a result of the adoption of SAB 101, we recognize revenue and expense from certain OmniTRACS and similar hardware product sales ratably over the shorter of the estimated life of the hardware product or the expected service period, which is typically five years, as the messaging service is considered integral to the functionality of the hardware. Messaging revenue is recorded as earned.

Revenue from providing services is recorded when earned. Revenue from long-term contracts is generally recognized using the percentage-of-completion method, based on costs incurred compared with total estimated costs. The percentage-of-completion method relies on estimates of total expected contract revenue and costs. Revenues and profit are subject to revisions as the contract progresses to completion. Revisions in profit estimates are charged or credited to income in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known. If actual contract costs are greater than expected, reduction of contract profit would be required. Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of incurred cost and accrued profits are classified as unearned revenue. Estimated contract losses are recognized when determined. If substantive uncertainty related to customer acceptance exists or the contract’s duration is relatively short, we use the completed-contract method.

We recognize software license fees when all of the following criteria are met: the written agreement is executed; the software is delivered; the license fee is fixed and determinable; collectibility of the license fee is probable; and vendor-specific objective evidence exists to allocate the total license fee to elements of multiple-element arrangements, including post-contract customer support. When contracts contain multiple elements wherein vendor-specific objective evidence exists for all undelivered elements, we recognize revenue for the delivered elements and defer revenue for the undelivered elements until the remaining obligations have been satisfied. If vendor-specific objective evidence does not exist for all undelivered elements, revenue for the delivered and undelivered elements is deferred until remaining obligations have been satisfied, or if the undelivered element is post-contract customer support, revenue is recognized ratably over the support period. Significant judgments and estimates are made in connection with the recognition of software license revenue, including assessments of collectibility and the fair values of deliverable elements. The amount or timing of our software license revenue may differ as a result of changes in these judgments or estimates.

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers and entities we have financed to make required payments. We evaluate the adequacy of allowances for doubtful accounts based on analyses of historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, past transaction history with the customer, current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms. If we determine that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, we defer revenue recognition until collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash. If the financial condition of our customers and entities we have financed were to deteriorate, adversely affecting their ability to make payments, additional allowances would be required.

Our business acquisitions typically result in goodwill and other intangible assets, which affect the amount of future period amortization expense and possible impairment expense that we will incur. The determination of the value of such intangible assets requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect our

consolidated financial statements. We assess potential impairments to intangible assets when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recovered. Our judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators and future cash flows related to intangible assets are based on operational performance of our acquired businesses, market conditions and other factors. Future events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that goodwill associated with our acquired businesses is impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

We hold minority strategic investments in publicly-traded companies whose share prices may be highly volatile and in private companies whose values are difficult to determine. We record impairment charges when we believe an investment has experienced a decline that is other than temporary. The determination that a decline is other than temporary is subjective and influenced by many factors. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of investees could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the investments, thereby possibly requiring impairment charges in the future. We use the equity method of accounting for certain strategic investments. We rely on unaudited information provided by the investees to record our equity in the investees operating results during the investees’ interim periods. Future adjustments to previously reported results of these investees could adversely impact our results of operations.

Since we believe it is more likely than not that deductions from future employee stock option exercises will exceed future taxable income, we provide a valuation allowance on substantially all of our net deferred tax assets. We consider estimated future taxable income and on-going tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance.

We record an income tax provision or benefit based on the expected annual effective income tax rate. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes. We estimate annual taxable income, including future deductions from stock option exercises and the amount of R&D tax credits that will be available to us. Future deductions from stock option exercises are affected by stock price volatility. We also consider our ability to reinvest undistributed earnings for non-United States subsidiaries indefinitely in operations outside the United States. Should our actual taxable income, R&D tax credits or deductions from stock option exercises differ from our estimates or should we have to repatriate foreign earnings, we would have to adjust the income tax provision in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known. Our tax provision could also be adversely affected by tax decisions contrary to our treatment of items on our tax return.

We are currently involved in certain legal proceedings. We estimate the range of liability related to pending litigation where the amount and range of loss can be estimated. Where there is a range of loss, we record the minimum estimated liability related to those claims. As additional information becomes available, we assess the potential liability related to our pending litigation and revise our estimates. Revisions in our estimates of the potential liability could materially impact our results of operations.

In February 2000, we purchased 308,000 units of Leap Wireless International Inc.’s (Leap Wireless) senior discount notes with detachable warrants for $150 million. The notes mature in April 2010 and bear interest at 14.5% payable beginning in 2005. In addition, we hold 489,000 shares of Leap Wireless’ stock at June 30, 2002. During the third quarter of fiscal 2002, we determined that declines in the market values of our investments in Leap Wireless were other than temporary. As a result, we recorded $150 million and $17 million in other-than-temporary losses on marketable securities for the notes and stock, respectively, during the third quarter of fiscal 2002. We also recorded $56 million in losses related to changes in the fair

values of Leap Wireless derivative investments for the first nine months of fiscal 2002. The remaining recorded values of Leap Wireless investments totaled $17 million at June 30, 2002, including $3 million in derivative instruments. Under the terms of our senior secured credit facility with Leap Wireless, we are committed to fund up to $125 million in connection with Leap Wireless’ bid for PCS spectrum licenses in the FCC’s Auction No. 35. See “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies.”

On November 29, 2001, we forgave $119 million under our debt facility with VeloCom, Inc. (VeloCom), an investor in Vesper Holding. We also converted our remaining $56 million convertible promissory note into equity securities of VeloCom (the VeloCom exchange) in conjunction with our acquisition of Vesper Holding. The VeloCom exchange increased our equity interest in VeloCom to 49.9%. We use the equity method to account for our investment in VeloCom.

In fiscal 1999, we acquired an approximate 16% ownership interest in Vesper Sao Paulo S.A. and Vesper S.A. (the Vesper Operating Companies). The Vesper Operating Companies were formed by a consortium of investors to provide wireless and wireline telephone services in the northern region of Brazil and in the state of Sao Paulo. In addition, we extended long-term financing to the Vesper Operating Companies related to our financing arrangement with Ericsson. On November 13, 2001, we consummated a series of transactions as part of an overall financial restructuring (the Restructuring) of the Vesper Operating Companies.

Pursuant to the Restructuring, we committed to invest $266 million, and VeloCom committed to invest $80 million, in a newly formed holding company called Vesper Holding. Vesper Holding acquired certain liabilities of the Vesper Operating Companies from their vendors for $135 million and the issuance of warrants to purchase an approximate 7% interest in Vesper Holding, and the vendors released in full any claims that they might have against us, VeloCom, the Vesper Operating Companies and other related parties arising from or related to the acquired liabilities. In a series of related transactions, Vesper Holding agreed to contribute the acquired liabilities to the Vesper Operating Companies in exchange for equity securities and to cancel the contributed liabilities. At June 30, 2002, we directly owned 72% of the issued and outstanding equity of Vesper Holding, and we indirectly owned an additional 11.9% of Vesper Holding through our ownership interest in VeloCom, totaling an 83.9% direct and indirect interest.

The preliminary allocation of the purchase price, based on the estimated fair values of acquired assets and liabilities assumed, reflects $313 million for property, plant and equipment, $39 million for licenses, and $31 million for other intangible assets. We are in the process of finalizing the purchase price allocation and recorded $5 million in net adjustments reducing property, plant and equipment since the acquisition. We do not anticipate any additional material adjustments to the allocation. Property, plant and equipment are depreciated over useful lives ranging from 2 to 18 years. Licenses and other intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives of 18 years and 3 to 18 years, respectively.

When we obtained the controlling interest in Vesper Holding, Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock,” required that we adjust our prior period results to account for our original 16% ownership interest in the Vesper Operating Companies, predecessors to Vesper Holding, using the equity method of accounting. As a result, the Company recorded $40 million and $106 million of equity in losses of investees for the three months and nine months ended July 1, 2001, respectively, and a $59 million reduction in finance receivables and retained earnings at September 30, 2001. We previously recorded $107 million in asset impairment charges and other than temporary losses on other investments during the third quarter of fiscal 2001. As a result of the prior period adjustments, net income for the three months and nine months ended July 1, 2001 decreased by $67 million and $1 million, respectively.

The Vesper Operating Companies expect to incur increasing operating losses and negative cash flows from operations through calendar 2003 as they expand operations and enter new markets, even if and after they achieve positive cash flows from operations in the initial operating markets.

We have a bridge loan facility with Pegaso Comunicaciones y Sistemas S.A. de C.V., a wholly owned subsidiary of Pegaso Telecomunicaciones, S.A. de C.V., a CDMA wireless operating company in Mexico (collectively referred to as Pegaso). The facility was payable in full on October 31, 2001, is in default and is subject to a forbearance agreement. At June 30, 2002, $413 million was outstanding under the bridge loan facility, net of deferred interest and unearned fees. We stopped recognizing interest on the bridge loan facility effective at the beginning of the fourth fiscal quarter of 2001.

We also have provided equipment and related financing to Pegaso. At June 30, 2002, $318 million of this financing was outstanding under the equipment loan facility, net of deferred interest and unearned fees, including $54 million of such financing acquired from Ericsson during the third quarter of fiscal 2002. This financing is currently in default and subject to a forbearance agreement. Pegaso stopped making interest payments on loans outstanding under the equipment loan facility. We stopped recognizing interest on these loans effective at the beginning of the fourth fiscal quarter of 2001.

As a result of a series of agreements signed on January 16, 2002 by and among Pegaso’s owners and lenders, including us, we agreed to provide $65 million of interim financing to Pegaso, including $5 million in capitalized fees. At June 30, 2002, all $65 million of this interim financing was outstanding. A Pegaso shareholder purchased a $25 million participation from us in this financing.

The $65 million initial interim financing must be repaid in full on the earlier of (i) the date that is 30 days after the Telefonica Moviles acquisition of 65% of Pegaso closes or (ii) the date that agreement is terminated. Interest is payable at 12% unless these interim loans are paid in full within 30 days of the closing date, in which case no interest will be payable. We have not recognized interest income on this interim financing.

Loans under the $140 million additional interim financing must be repaid in full on the earlier of (i) the date that is 30 days after the Telefonica Moviles acquisition of 65% of Pegaso closes or (ii) the date that agreement is terminated. The first $100 million of additional interim loans bears interest at LIBOR, and the remaining $40 million bears interest at LIBOR plus 1%, in each case if the additional interim financing is repaid in full within 30 days of the closing date; otherwise, these amounts will bear interest at 12% and 20% respectively. We have not recognized interest income on this additional interim financing.

If and when the Telefonica Moviles acquisition of 65% of Pegaso closes, we expect to receive approximately $430 million to $445 million in satisfaction of the bridge loan facility within 60 days of the close. We would be required to use approximately $140 million of these proceeds to purchase outstanding vendor debt owed by Pegaso to other lenders. The remaining vendor debt due to us, including the equipment

Our aggregate commitment to provide additional long-term financing to Pegaso under its arrangements with Ericsson remains unchanged at $105 million, subject to Pegaso or a new buyer meeting certain conditions. We had $5 million in other financing commitments to Pegaso as of June 30, 2002.

Pegaso is at an early stage of development and, if it remains independent, may not be able to compete successfully. Competitors in Mexico have greater financial resources and more established operations than Pegaso. As is normal for early stage wireless operators, Pegaso is experiencing significant losses and negative cash flows from operations. Based on current information and available evidence, we believe that the sale transaction to Telefonica Moviles will likely be consummated and that, as a result, we will ultimately be able to collect all recorded amounts. The ability of Pegaso’s owners and lenders to complete the sale transaction is uncertain. Failure to complete the sale transaction could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

Total revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 were $771 million, compared to $657 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Total revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 included $49 million related to the consolidation of Vesper Holding effective in November 2001 and $3 million related to the Globalstar business. Total revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2001 included $24 million related to Globalstar. Starting in fiscal 2001, we stopped recognizing revenue related to Globalstar until cash payment is received. Excluding Vesper Holding and Globalstar, total revenues increased by $86 million, primarily due to an increase in revenues from sales of integrated circuits, an increase in revenues from royalties in the QTL segment and software development revenues related to the Qchat licensing agreement.

Cost of revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 was $288 million, compared to $236 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Cost of revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 included $51 million related to the consolidation of Vesper Holding and $2 million related to our continuing obligation to Globalstar. Cost of revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2001 included $20 million related to Globalstar. Excluding Vesper Holding and Globalstar, cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues was 33% for the third quarter of fiscal 2002, compared to 34% for the third quarter of fiscal 2001. The margin improvement in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 is primarily due to the change in product mix toward the higher end devices utilizing our 3G CDMA2000 1X integrated circuits products and the increase in revenues from royalties in the QTL segment. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues may fluctuate in future quarters depending on the mix of products sold and services provided, royalties and license fees earned, competitive pricing, new product introduction costs and other factors.

For the third quarter of fiscal 2002, research and development expenses were $118 million or 15% of revenues, compared to $107 million or 16% of revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2001. The dollar increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to increased integrated circuit product initiatives to support high-speed wireless Internet access and multimode, multi-band, multi-network products including cdmaOne, CDMA2000 1X/1xEV-DO, GSM/ GPRS, WCDMA and position location technologies and an increase in QWBS research and development initiatives.

For the third quarter of fiscal 2002, selling, general and administrative expenses were $152 million or 20% of revenues, compared to $104 million or 16% of revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 included $43 million related to the consolidation of Vesper Holding. Excluding Vesper Holding, selling, general, and administrative expenses of $110 million comprised 15% of revenues. The dollar increase was primarily due to expenses related to the BREW Developers’ Conference and international business development, partially offset by a reduction in bad debt expense.

Amortization of goodwill and other acquisition-related intangible assets were $65 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2002, compared to $65 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Amortization charges are primarily related to the acquisition of SnapTrack in March 2000.

For the third quarter of fiscal 2002, there were no asset impairment and related charges compared to $1 million of credits in the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Asset impairment related credits during the third quarter of fiscal 2001 were comprised primarily of adjustments to certain reserves related to the Globalstar business.

For the third quarter of fiscal 2002, other operating expenses were $9 million, compared to $6 million of credits in the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Other operating expenses during the third quarter of fiscal 2002 resulted from the write down of a note receivable from a development stage CDMA carrier. Other operating credits during the third quarter of fiscal 2001 were related to a clarification of a prior arbitration decision made against us.

Interest expense was $9 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2002, primarily related to the $125 million long-term debt of Vesper Holding included in other current and noncurrent liabilities.

Net investment expense was $184 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 compared to $40 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2001. The change was primarily comprised as follows (in millions):

The increase in interest income on corporate cash and marketable securities was a result of higher average cash and marketable securities balances. The decline in QSI interest income was a result of the cessation of interest income recognition on Pegaso debt facilities starting in the fourth fiscal quarter of fiscal 2001 and on Leap Wireless bonds starting in the third quarter of fiscal 2002. The other-than-temporary losses on marketable securities during the third quarter of fiscal 2002 related to our investments in Leap Wireless. The change in fair values of derivative instruments primarily results from movements in the price of Leap Wireless stock, which affects the fair value of our warrants to acquire Leap Wireless stock. Equity in losses of investees decreased as a result of the consolidation of Vesper Holding effective November 13, 2001, as these losses are now included in operations.

Income tax benefit was $40 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 compared to income tax expense of $184 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2001. The annual effective tax rate is estimated to be 27% for fiscal 2002, compared to the negative 3% annual effective tax rate estimated during the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Income tax benefit was recorded in the third quarter of 2002 to reduce the tax provision for losses in the third quarter and to reflect the change in the estimated year-end rate from 36% to 27%. The current estimated tax rate is lower than the tax rate estimated in the second quarter primarily because of a reduction in estimated year-end losses of foreign subsidiaries for which it is more likely than not we will receive no benefit and an

increase in the partial reversal of the deferred tax valuation allowance that was previously charged to expense. Income tax expense of $184 million was recorded in the third quarter of 2001 as a result of a change in the expected annual effective tax rate to negative 3% from 45% estimated in the second quarter of fiscal 2001.

First Nine Months of Fiscal 2002 Compared to First Nine Months of Fiscal 2001

Total revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2002 were $2,166 million, compared to $2,029 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2001. Total revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2002 included $91 million related to the consolidation of Vesper Holding effective in November 2001 and $8 million related to the Globalstar business. Total revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2001 included $50 million related to Globalstar. Excluding Vesper Holding and Globalstar, total revenues increased by $88 million. Revenues increased primarily due to the change in product mix toward the higher end devises utilizing our 3G CDMA2000 1X integrated circuits products, software development revenues related to the Qchat licensing agreement and an increase in revenues from royalties in the QTL segment. We shipped approximately 45 million MSM integrated circuits, consistent with the 45 million shipped in the first nine months of fiscal 2001. Revenues from royalties paid by third parties were $517 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2002, compared to $503 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2001. Revenues from Samsung Electronics Company (Samsung), Kyocera Wireless Corp. and LG Electronics, Inc., customers of both QCT and QTL, comprised an aggregate of 16%, 14% and 11% of total consolidated revenues, respectively, in the first nine months of fiscal 2002.

Cost of revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2002 was $825 million, compared to $794 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2001. Cost of revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2002 included $133 million related to the consolidation of Vesper Holding and $8 million related to our on-going obligation to Globalstar. Cost of revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2001 included $116 million related to Globalstar. Excluding Vesper Holding and Globalstar, cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues was 33% for the first nine months of fiscal 2002 compared to 34% for the first nine months of fiscal 2001. The margin improvement in the first nine months of fiscal 2002 is primarily due to the change in product mix toward the higher end device utilizing our CDMA2000 1X integrated circuits products. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues may fluctuate in future quarters depending on the mix of products sold and services provided, royalties and license fees earned, competitive pricing, new product introduction costs and other factors.

For the first nine months of fiscal 2002, research and development expenses were $342 million or 16% of revenues, compared to $300 million or 15% of revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2001. The dollar and percentage increases in research and development expenses were primarily due to increased integrated circuit product initiatives to support high-speed wireless Internet access and multimode, multi-band, multi-network products including cdmaOne, CDMA2000 1X/1xEV-DO, GSM/GPRS, WCDMA and position location technologies and an increase in QWBS research and development initiatives, partially offset by a reduction of support efforts related to the Globalstar business.

For the first nine months of fiscal 2002, selling, general and administrative expenses were $377 million or 17% of revenues, compared to $271 million or 13% of revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2001. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the first nine months of fiscal 2002 included $69 million related to the consolidation of Vesper Holding. Excluding Vesper Holding, selling, general and administrative expenses comprised 15% of revenues. The dollar increase was primarily due to increased headcount for our support and marketing efforts related to the BREW application development platform and increases in marketing expenses related to the expansion of our integrated circuit customer base, partially offset by a reduction in bad debt expense.

Amortization of goodwill and other acquisition-related intangible assets was $192 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2002, compared to $191 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2001. Amortization charges are primarily related to the acquisition of SnapTrack in March 2000.

For the first nine months of fiscal 2002, there were no asset impairment and related charges compared to $472 million of such charges in the first nine months of fiscal 2001. Asset impairment and related charges

For the first nine months of fiscal 2002, other operating expenses were $9 million compared to $63 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2001. Other operating expenses during the first nine months of fiscal 2002 resulted from the write down of note receivable from a development stage CDMA carrier. Other operating expense in the first nine months of fiscal 2001 was related to an arbitration decision made against us.

Interest expense was $17 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2002, compared to $10 million for the first nine months fiscal 2001. Interest expense for the first nine months of fiscal 2002 was primarily related to the $125 million long-term debt of Vesper Holding included in other current and non-current liabilities. Interest expense for the first nine months of fiscal 2001 was primarily related to interest charges resulting from the arbitration decision made against us.

Net investment expense was $171 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2002 compared to $238 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2001. The change was primarily comprised as follows (in millions):

The decline in interest income on corporate cash and marketable securities was a result of lower interest rates. The decline in QSI interest income was a result of the cessation of interest income recognition on Pegaso debt facilities starting in the fourth fiscal quarter of fiscal 2001 and on Leap Wireless bonds starting in the third quarter of fiscal 2002. The other-than-temporary losses on marketable securities during the first nine months of fiscal 2002 primarily related to our investments in Leap Wireless. The change in fair values of derivative instruments primarily results from movements in the price of Leap Wireless stock, which affects the fair values of our warrants to acquire Leap Wireless stock. Equity in losses of investees decreased as a result of the consolidation of Vesper Holding effective November 13, 2001, as these losses are now included in operations.

For the first nine months of fiscal 2002, there were no other non-operating charges compared to $176 million of such charges in the first nine months of fiscal 2001. Other non-operating charges in the first nine months of fiscal 2001 were primarily comprised of a $120 million write-down of the note receivable from VeloCom and a $57 million write-down of the recorded values of a note receivable from Globalstar and warrants to acquire partnership interests in Globalstar to their estimated fair values.

Income tax expense was $63 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2002, compared to a benefit of $2 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2001. The annual effective tax rate is estimated to be 27% for fiscal 2002, compared to the negative 3% annual effective tax rate estimated during the third quarter of fiscal 2001. The estimated annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2002 is lower than the statutory rate due to the reduction of

deferred tax assets and the related valuation allowance that was previously charged to tax expense, partially offset by foreign losses for which we are not recording a tax benefit. The actual effective tax rate for fiscal 2001 was negative 25%. The fiscal 2001 effective tax rate was the result of pre-tax losses for which no tax benefit was recorded and foreign tax expense. The expected annual effective tax rate on profits for fiscal 2002 cannot be meaningfully compared to the effective tax rate on losses for the prior fiscal year.

We recorded an $18 million loss, net of taxes, in fiscal 2001 as the net cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle at September 30, 2000. The cumulative effect of the adoption of SAB 101 was a $147 million loss, net of taxes, offset by a $129 million gain, net of taxes, resulting from the cumulative effect of the adoption of FAS 133. The gain resulting from the adoption of FAS 133 related primarily to the unrealized gain on a warrant to purchase 4,500,000 shares of Leap Wireless common stock issued to us in connection with our spin-off of Leap Wireless in September 1998.

Our Segment Results for the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2002 Compared to Third Quarter of Fiscal 2001

The following should be read in conjunction with the third quarter financial results of fiscal 2002 for each reporting segment. See “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 6 — Segment Information.”

QCT segment revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 were $404 million compared to $333 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Earnings before taxes for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 were $118 million compared to $71 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Revenues and earning before taxes increased primarily due to an increase in unit shipments of MSM integrated circuits and the effect of the change in product mix toward the higher end devices utilizing our 3G CDMA2000 1X products. Approximately 16 million MSM integrated circuits were shipped during the third quarter of fiscal 2002, compared to 14 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Research and development and selling and marketing expenses were higher for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 as compared to the year ago period primarily associated with new integrated circuit product and technology initiatives to support high-speed wireless Internet access and multi-band, multi-mode, multi-network, products including cdmaOne, CDMA2000 1X/1xEV-DO, GSM/ GPRS, WCDMA and position location technologies. QCT inventories increased by 26% during the third quarter of fiscal 2002 primarily as a result of anticipated future demand for 1X products.

QTL segment revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 were $199 million compared to $180 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Revenues from royalties paid by third party licensees were $168 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2002, compared to $154 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Revenues from license fees were $14 million in third quarter of fiscal 2002, compared to $13 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Earnings before taxes for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 were $174 million compared to $153 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2001. The increase in revenues and earnings before taxes was primarily due to an increase in sales of CDMA products by licensees resulting from higher demand for CDMA products across all major regions of CDMA deployment, with the exception of Latin America which has been impacted by the economic downturn in that market. During the first nine months of fiscal 2002, revenue from royalties paid by third party licensees was $517 million, compared to $503 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2001. During the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2002, we recognized $2 million and $4 million, respectively, in revenue related to equity received as consideration for license fees.

QWI segment revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 were $110 million compared to $104 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Losses before taxes for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 were $3 million compared to earnings before taxes of $5 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2001. Revenues increased primarily due to an increase in software development and services revenues related to our BREW products and

Qchat licensing agreement. Earnings before taxes decreased primarily due to our development, support and marketing efforts related to the BREW application development platform and an increase in QUALCOMM Wireless Business Solutions research and development expenditures. We shipped approximately 12,000 OmniTRACS and other related communications systems during the third quarter of fiscal 2002, compared to approximately 11,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2001.

QSI segment revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 were $49 million, primarily related to the consolidation of Vesper Holding. QSI segment losses before taxes for the third quarter of fiscal 2002 were $285 million compared to $186 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2001. The increase in losses was primarily due to $194 million in charges related to Leap Wireless investments, including $167 million in other-than-temporary losses on Leap Wireless marketable securities and $27 million in losses related to changes in the fair values of Leap Wireless warrants. During the third quarter of fiscal 2002, QSI recorded a $35 million loss, net of minority interest, due to the consolidation of Vesper Holding and $7 million of equity losses in VeloCom, as compared with $40 million of equity losses for the Vesper Operating Companies in the third quarter of fiscal 2001. In addition, QSI realized a $38 million decrease in interest income and $9 million in realized losses on marketable securities, as compared to $12 million in realized gains in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, the effect of which was partially offset by a $30 million decrease in other-than-temporary losses on other investments. During the third quarter of fiscal 2001, we recorded a $120 million charge to write down a note receivable from VeloCom to its fair value.

Cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities were $2,825 million at June 30, 2002, an increase of $245 million from September 30, 2001. The increase during the first nine months of fiscal 2002 was primarily the result of $519 million in cash provided by operating activities, $103 million in net proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our stock option and employee stock purchase plans and $10 million in proceeds received from Vesper Holding’s minority interest shareholders, partially offset by $290 million in cash used for other investments and acquisitions and $108 million in capital expenditures. We expect Vesper Holding to require approximately $25 to $35 million in cash funding through the end of fiscal 2002.

Accounts receivable increased by 8% during the third quarter of fiscal 2002. The increase in accounts receivable was primarily due to higher revenues and the timing of cash receipts for royalty receivables, partially offset by a net increase in Vesper Holding receivables. Excluding Vesper Holding receivables days sales were 66 days at June 30, 2002 compared to 61 days at March 31, 2002. The change in days sales is consistent with the increase in revenue and the resultant increase in accounts receivable balances.

We believe our current cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and cash generated from operations will satisfy our expected working and other capital requirements for the foreseeable future based on current business plans, including investments in other companies and other assets to support the growth of our business, financing for customers of CDMA infrastructure products in accordance with the agreement with Ericsson, financing under agreements with CDMA telecommunications carriers, and other commitments. We intend to continue our strategic investment activities to promote the worldwide adoption of CDMA products and the growth of CDMA-based wireless data and wireless Internet products and solutions. As part of these investment activities, we may provide financing to facilitate the marketing and sale of CDMA equipment by authorized suppliers. In the event additional needs for cash arise, we may raise additional funds from a combination of sources including potential debt and equity issuance.

Information regarding our long-term purchase commitments is provided in the Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001. See “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies”. Information regarding our operating leases at June 30, 2002 is provided in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies.”

Commitments to extend long-term financing to certain CDMA customers of Ericsson totaled approximately $473 million. The commitment to fund $346 million of this amount expires on November 6, 2003. The funding of the remaining $127 million, if it occurs, is not subject to a fixed expiration date. The financing commitments are subject to the CDMA customers meeting conditions prescribed in the financing arrangements and, in certain cases, to Ericsson also financing a portion of such sales and services. Such financing is generally collateralized by the related equipment. Commitments represent the maximum amounts to be financed under these arrangements; actual financing may be in lesser amounts.

In December 2001, we agreed to invest up to $200 million in exchange for up to 4% of the common shares of Reliance Infocomm Limited (RIL), formerly Reliance Communications Limited, a wireless carrier in India. RIL intends to construct and operate a CDMA commercial network deploying CDMA2000 1X technology to provide basic telephone services, Wireless Local Loop (WLL) with limited mobility and national long distance services in India. At June 30, 2002, because certain conditions precedent under the agreement had not been satisfied, our obligation to make this investment had become non-binding. However, we retain the option to purchase the shares contingent upon RIL’s completion of certain performance milestones. Funding would occur through September 2003 if we complete the investment. At June 30, 2002, we had not purchased any shares related to this agreement.

Information regarding our other financial commitments at June 30, 2002 is provided in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 3 — Investments in Other Entities, Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies and Note 8 — Acquisitions.”

recognition and measurement of intangible assets apart from goodwill, and (3) require that unamortized negative goodwill be written off immediately as an extraordinary gain instead of being deferred and amortized. FAS 141 also requires that, upon adoption of FAS 142, we reclassify the carrying amounts of certain intangible assets into or out of goodwill, based on certain criteria. FAS 142 supersedes APB 17, “Intangible Assets,” and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. FAS 142 primarily addresses the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to their initial recognition. The provisions of FAS 142 (1) prohibit the amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, (2) require that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles assets be tested annually for impairment (and in interim periods if certain events occur indicating that the carrying value of goodwill and/or indefinite-lived intangible assets may be impaired), (3) require that reporting units be identified for the purpose of assessing potential impairments of goodwill, and (4) remove the forty-year limitation on the amortization period of intangible assets that have finite lives.

FAS 142 requires that goodwill be tested annually for impairment using a two-step process. The first step (Step 1) is to identify a potential impairment and, in transition, this step must be measured as of the beginning of the fiscal year. However, a company has six months from the date of adoption to complete the first step. The second step of the goodwill impairment test measures the amount of the impairment loss (measured as of the beginning of the year of adoption), if any, and must be completed by the end of fiscal 2003. Any impairment loss resulting from the transitional impairment tests would be reflected as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the first quarter 2003.

We will adopt the provisions of FAS 142 in our first quarter of fiscal 2003. We have determined our reporting units and the amounts of goodwill, intangible assets, other assets and liabilities allocable to those reporting units and expect to complete Step 1 in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. During the third quarter of fiscal 2002, we performed a preliminary Step 1 analysis. We will finalize our Step 1 analysis as of the date of adoption. Based on our preliminary Step 1 analysis, we do not expect the adoption of FAS 142 to have a material impact on our financial position. We will no longer record goodwill amortization starting in fiscal 2003. We recorded $62 million and $184 million in goodwill amortization expense during the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2002, respectively.

In August 2001, the FASB issued FAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” FAS 144 replaces FAS 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of.” The FASB issued FAS 144 to establish a single accounting model, based on the framework established in FAS 121, as FAS 121 did not address the accounting for a segment of a business accounted for as a discontinued operation under APB 30, “Reporting The Results of Operations — Reporting The Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions.” FAS 144 also resolves significant implementation issues related to FAS 121. Companies are required to adopt FAS 144 for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, but early adoption is permitted. We will adopt FAS 144 as of the beginning of fiscal 2003. We do not expect the adoption of FAS 144 to have a material impact on our operating results and financial position.

You should consider each of the following factors as well as the other information in this Quarterly Report in evaluating our business and our prospects. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business and financial results could be harmed. In that case the trading price of our common stock could decline. You should also refer to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001, including our financial statements and the related notes.

Global economic weakness that impacts the wireless communications industry could negatively affect our revenues and operating results.

Recent global economic weakness has had wide-ranging effects on markets that we serve, particularly wireless communications equipment manufacturers and network operators. This downturn has had a negative effect on our revenues from royalties, license fees and integrated circuit products. We cannot predict whether a recovery in the near term, if it occurs, will benefit us, and if it does not, our ability to increase or maintain our revenues and operating results may be impaired. In addition, because we intend to continue to make significant investments in research and development and to maintain extensive ongoing customer service and support capability, any decline in the rate of growth of our revenues will have a significant adverse impact on our operating results.

If CDMA technology is not widely deployed, or if delays occur in the adoption of 3G CDMA standards, our revenues may not grow as anticipated or our stock price could fall.

We focus our business primarily on developing, patenting and commercializing CDMA technology for wireless telecommunications applications. Other digital wireless communications technologies, particularly GSM technology, have been more widely adopted than CDMA technology. If CDMA technology does not become the preferred wireless communications industry standard in the countries where our products and those of our customers and licensees are sold, or if wireless communications service providers do not deploy networks that utilize CDMA technology, our business and financial results could suffer.

To increase our revenues and market share in future periods, we are dependent upon the adoption and commercial deployment of 3G wireless communications equipment, products and services based on our CDMA technology. Industry and government participants of the International Telecommunications Union and regional standards development organizations are currently considering a variety of standards that may be utilized in 3G wireless networks. We continue to advocate the selection of 3G standards based on CDMA technology. We cannot assure you that any of the standards development organizations will select the standards that we are advocating. If they select other standards, our business may suffer, and even if our standards are selected, we cannot assure you that they will achieve commercial acceptance in a timely manner, or at all. Our 1xEV-DO was approved by the International Telecommunications Union for inclusion in the CDMA2000 mode of the 3G standard. Commercial deployment of CDMA2000 1X began in October 2000 in South Korea. In addition, commercial deployment of CDMA2000 1X by Leap Wireless began in December 2001 in the cities of Phoenix and Denver, representing the first commercial deployment of 3G technology in North America. Also, nationwide commercial deployment of CDMA2000 1X by KDDI Corporation (KDDI) began in Japan in April 2002. WCDMA, a technology designed as an alternative to CDMA2000, is currently in the standardization process and has been adopted by several European, Japanese and United States carriers. We expect that, although limited systems have been placed in service, widespread and standardized WCDMA networks will not begin operation until 2003 or later, given that the WCDMA standard and interoperability testing is not yet complete. Many GSM operators are expected to deploy GPRS, a packet data technology, as a 2.5G bridge technology while waiting for 3G WCDMA to become available. GPRS is the only widely anticipated packet data technology that is not CDMA-based. We believe that our CDMA patent portfolio is

applicable to all CDMA systems that may serve as the basis for such standards. However, we cannot assure you that the wireless communications industry will adopt 3G standards based on CDMA technology, or that our CDMA patents will be determined to be applicable to any proposed 3G standards. If we are unable to successfully, widely and timely deploy CDMA2000 as the preferred 3G technology, our business and financial results could suffer.

Because we have made significant investments in and loans to CDMA carriers, our financial condition may be harmed if those CDMA carriers are not successful.

We provide significant financing to CDMA carriers to promote the worldwide adoption of CDMA products and services. Many domestic and international CDMA carriers to whom we have provided financing have limited operating histories, are faced with significant capital requirements, are highly leveraged or have limited financial resources. Certain carriers to whom we have provided financing have defaulted on their obligations to us, and it is possible that others will default on their obligations to us in the future. Any such defaults could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results. Due to currency fluctuations and international risks, foreign borrowers may become unable to pay their debts to us from revenues generated by their projects that are denominated in local currencies. Further, we may not be permitted to retain a security interest in any spectrum licenses held by foreign carriers that we finance. These spectrum licenses initially may constitute the primary asset of the carriers. The amount of financing that we currently are providing and that we expect to provide in the future is substantial. See “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 3 — Investments in Other Entities.”

In November 2001, we acquired Vesper Holding, a CDMA carrier in Brazil. See “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8 — Acquisitions.” We expect Vesper Holding to incur increasing operating losses and negative cash flows from operations as it expands operations and enters new markets, even if and after it achieves positive cash flows from operations in initial operating markets. We may incur significant losses in the future related to our ownership of Vesper Holding, and we cannot assure you that Vesper Holding will ever operate profitably. Additional risks and uncertainties specific to Vesper Holding include risks associated with:


	•	the upgrade of the existing network to CDMA2000 1X and 1xEV-DO, including risks related to the operations of new systems and technologies, substantial required expenditures and potential unanticipated costs, the adequacy of suppliers and consumer acceptance of the products and services to be offered;

	•	the ability to establish a significant market presence in new geographic and service markets;

	•	the ability to compete with more well-established competitors in Brazil that may offer less expensive products and services, desirable or innovative products or have extensive resources or better financing;

	•	the ability to generate timely and accurate financial and management data;

	•	the availability and cost of capital; and

	•	the ability to develop future business opportunities critical to the realization of growth potential.

We derive a significant portion of our revenue from a limited number of customers and licensees. The loss of any one of our major customers or licensees could reduce our revenues and harm our ability to achieve or sustain acceptable levels of operating results.

During the first nine months of fiscal 2002, our three largest customers accounted for 41% of consolidated revenues, as compared to 37% in fiscal 2001. The loss of any one of our QCT segment’s significant customers or the delay, even if only temporary, or cancellation of significant orders from any of these customers would reduce our revenues in the period of the cancellation or deferral and could harm our ability to achieve or sustain acceptable levels of profitability. Accordingly, unless and until our QCT segment diversifies and expands its customer base, our future success will significantly depend upon the timing and size of future


	•	the product requirements of these customers;

	•	the financial and operational success of these customers; and

	•	the success of these customers’ products that incorporate our products.

Our QTL segment derives royalty revenues from shipments by our licensees. We derive a significant portion of our royalty revenue from a limited number of licensees. Our future success depends upon the ability of our licensees to develop and introduce high volume products that achieve and sustain market acceptance. We cannot assure you that our licensees will be successful or that the demand for wireless communications devices and services offered by our licensees will continue to increase. Any reduction in the demand for wireless communications devices utilizing our CDMA technology could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues from sales outside the United States, and numerous factors related to international business activities subject us to risks that could reduce the demand for our licensees’ products or our products, negatively affecting our operating results.

A significant part of our strategy involves our continued pursuit of growth opportunities in a number of international markets. We market, sell and service our products internationally. We have established sales offices around the world. We will continue to expand our international sales operations and enter new international markets. This expansion will require significant management attention and financial resources to successfully develop direct and indirect international sales and support channels, and we cannot assure you that we will be successful or that our expenditures in this effort will not exceed the amount of any resulting revenues. If we are not able to maintain or increase international market demand for our products, then we may not be able to maintain an acceptable rate of growth in our business.

Consolidated revenues from international customers as a percentage of total revenues were 69% in the first nine months of fiscal 2002, 65% in fiscal year 2001, 47% in fiscal year 2000 and 38% in fiscal year 1999. In many international markets, barriers to entry are created by long-standing relationships between our potential customers and their local providers and protective regulations, including local content and service requirements. In addition, our pursuit of international growth opportunities may require significant investments for an extended period before we realize returns, if any, on our investments. Our business could be adversely affected by a variety of uncontrollable and changing factors, including:


	•	unexpected changes in legal or regulatory requirements;

	•	difficulty in protecting our intellectual property rights in a particular foreign jurisdiction;

	•	our inability to successfully enter a significant foreign market, such as China or India;

	•	cultural differences in the conduct of business;

	•	difficulty in attracting qualified personnel and managing foreign activities;

	•	recessions in economies outside the United States;

	•	longer payment cycles for and greater difficulties collecting accounts receivable;

	•	export controls, tariffs and other trade protection measures;

	•	fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

	•	nationalization, expropriation and limitations on repatriation of cash;

	•	social, economic and political instability;

	•	natural disasters, acts of terrorism and war;


	•	taxation; and

	•	changes in United States laws and policies affecting trade, foreign investment and loans.

In addition to general risks associated with our international sales, licensing activities and operations, we are also subject to risks specific to the individual countries in which we do business. During the first nine months of fiscal 2002, 37% and 18% of our revenue was from customers and licensees based in South Korea and Japan, respectively, as compared to 35% and 22% during fiscal 2001, respectively. A significant downturn in the economies of Asian countries where many of our customers and licensees are located, particularly the economies of South Korea and Japan, would materially harm our business. In November 2001, we acquired Vesper Holding, a CDMA carrier in Brazil. A significant downturn in the economy of Brazil could materially harm our business and limit our strategic alternatives related to this investment. We also are subject to risks in certain markets in which our customers and licensees grant subsidies on handsets to their subscribers. For example, in the past the South Korean government limited the ability of telecommunications carriers to provide subsidies on handsets to their subscribers, and this, in turn, reduced our revenues from those sources. Further limitations on the ability of handset manufacturers to sell their products in South Korea, Japan or in other countries may have additional negative impacts on our revenues.

Foreign currency fluctuations could negatively affect future product sales or royalty revenue and harm our ability to collect receivables.

We are exposed to risk from fluctuations in foreign currencies that could impact our operating results, liquidity and financial condition. As a global concern, we face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates:


	•	Financial instruments held by our consolidated subsidiaries and other companies in which we invest that are not denominated in the functional currency of those entities are subject to the effects of currency fluctuations, which may affect our reported earnings. Our exposure to emerging market currencies may increase as we expand into those markets.

	•	Declines in currency values in selected regions may adversely affect our operating results because our products and those of our customers and licensees may become more expensive to purchase in the countries of the affected currencies. Our trade receivables are generally United States dollar denominated. Accordingly, any significant change in the value of the dollar against our customers’ or licensees’ functional currencies could result in an increase in our customers’ or licensees’ cash flow requirements and could consequently affect our ability to collect receivables.

	•	Foreign CDMA carriers to whom we have provided financing may be unable to pay their debts to us from revenues generated by their projects that are denominated in local currencies.

	•	Average selling prices for our customers’ products may be denominated in local currencies, and declines in local currency values may adversely affect future royalty revenue.

We may engage in strategic transactions that could result in significant charges or management disruption and fail to enhance stockholder value.

From time to time, we consider strategic transactions and alternatives with the goal of maximizing stockholder value. In the past we have acquired businesses, entered into joint ventures and made strategic investments in early stage companies and venture funds or incubators to support the adoption of CDMA and use of the wireless Internet. In November 2001, we acquired Vesper Holding, a CDMA carrier in Brazil. Most of our strategic investments entail a high degree of risk and will not become liquid until more than one year from the date of investment, if at all.

We will continue to evaluate potential strategic transactions and alternatives that we believe may enhance stockholder value. These potential future transactions may include a variety of different business arrangements, including acquisitions, spin-offs, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, restructurings, divestitures, business combinations and investments. Although our goal is to maximize stockholder value, such transactions

may impair stockholder value or otherwise adversely affect our business and the trading price of our stock. Any such transaction may require us to incur non-recurring or other charges and/or to consolidate or record our equity in start-up losses and may pose significant integration challenges and/or management and business disruptions, any of which could harm our operating results and business prospects.

The fair values of our strategic investments are subject to substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations and to market downturns. Downward fluctuations and market trends could adversely affect our operating results.

We maintain strategic holdings of various issuers and types. These securities include available-for-sale equity securities and derivative instruments that are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. We strategically invest in companies in the high-technology industry and typically do not attempt to reduce or eliminate our market exposure. Available-for-sale equity securities are recorded at fair value under FAS 115, and derivative instruments recorded at fair value under FAS 133 subject us to equity price risk. The fair market values of these securities and derivative instruments are subject to significant price volatility and, in general, suffered significant decreases in market value during fiscal 2001 and the first nine months of 2002. In addition, the realizable value of these securities and derivative instruments is subject to market and other conditions. Our investments in specific companies and industry segments may vary over time, and changes in concentrations may affect price volatility. We also invest in privately-held companies, including early stage companies, venture funds or incubators. These investments are recorded at cost, but the recorded values may become impaired due to changes in the companies’ condition or prospects. Our strategic investments are inherently risky as the market for the technologies or products the investees have under development may never materialize. As a result, we could lose all or a portion of our investments in these companies, which could negatively affect our financial position and operating results. See “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 3 — Investments in Other Entities” and “Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.”

We depend upon a limited number of third-party manufacturers to produce and test our products. Any disruptions in the operations of, or the loss of, any of these third parties could harm our ability to meet our delivery obligations to our customers and increase our cost of sales.

We subcontract all of our manufacturing and assembly, and most of the testing, of our integrated circuits. We depend upon a limited number of third parties to perform these functions, some of which are only available from single sources with which we do not have long-term contracts. IBM, Motorola, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. and Texas Instruments are the primary manufacturers of our family of integrated circuits. Our reliance on a sole-source vendor primarily occurs during the start-up phase of a new product. Once a new product reaches a significant volume level, we then establish alternative suppliers for technologies that we consider critical. Our reliance on sole or limited-source vendors involves risks. These risks include possible shortages of capacity, product performance shortfalls, and reduced controls over delivery schedules, manufacturing capability, quality assurance, quantity and costs. We have no firm long-term commitments from our manufacturers to supply products to us for any specific period, or in any specific quantity, except as may be provided in a particular purchase order. As a result, these manufacturers may allocate, and in the past have allocated, capacity to the production of other products while reducing deliveries to us on short notice.

Our operations also may be harmed by lengthy or recurring disruptions at any of the facilities of our manufacturers. These disruptions may include labor strikes, work stoppages, terrorism, war, fire, earthquake, flooding or other natural disasters. These disruptions could cause significant delays in shipments until we are able to shift the products from an affected manufacturer to another manufacturer. The loss of a significant third-party manufacturer or the inability of a third-party manufacturer to meet performance and quality specifications or delivery schedules could harm our ability to meet our delivery obligations to our customers.

In addition, one or more of our manufacturers may obtain licenses from us to manufacture CDMA integrated circuits that compete with our products. In this event, the manufacturer could elect to allocate

scarce components and manufacturing capacity to their own products and reduce deliveries to us. In the event of a loss of, or a decision to change, a key third-party manufacturer, qualifying a new manufacturer and commencing volume production or testing could involve delay and expense, resulting in lost revenues, reduced operating margins and possible loss of customers.

Several of the critical products and services used in our existing and proposed products are currently available only from third-party single or limited sources. These include items such as electronic and radio frequency components, and other sophisticated parts and subassemblies which are used in the OmniTRACS, TruckMAIL, OmniExpress, LINQ and OmniOne products. These third parties include companies such as M/ A Com, Rakon, Mini Circuits, Cambridge, Andrews, ADI, Deutsch, PCI, Key Tronic, Seavey, Symbol, Talon, Thomson Airpax and Eagle Picher. Our reliance and the reliance of our licensees on sole or limited source vendors involve risks. These risks include possible shortages of certain key components, product performance shortfalls, and reduced control over delivery schedules, manufacturing capability, quality and costs. In the event of a long-term supply interruption, alternate sources could be developed in a majority of the cases. The inability to obtain adequate quantities of significant compliant materials on a timely basis could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, liquidity and financial position.

A reduction or interruption in component supply or a significant increase in component prices could have a material adverse effect on our business or profitability.

Our ability to meet customer demands depends, in part, on our ability to obtain timely and adequate delivery of parts and components from our suppliers and internal manufacturing capacity. We have experienced component shortages in the past, including components for our integrated circuit products, that have adversely affected our operations. Although we work closely with our suppliers to avoid these types of shortages, we may continue to encounter these problems in the future. A reduction or interruption in component supply or a significant increase in the price of one or more components could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Defects or errors in our products could harm our relations with our customers and expose us to liability. Similar problems related to the products of our customers or licensees would harm our business.

Our software and integrated circuit products are inherently complex and may contain defects and errors that are detected only when the products are in use. Further, because our products perform critical functions in our customers’ products and networks, such defects or errors could have a serious impact on our customers, which could damage our reputation, harm our customer relationships and expose us to liability. Defects or impurities in our components, materials or software or those used by our customers or licensees, equipment failures or other difficulties could adversely affect our ability and that of our customers and licensees to ship products on a timely basis as well as our customers’ or licensees’ demand for our products. Any such shipment delays or declines in demand could reduce our revenues and harm our ability to achieve or sustain acceptable levels of profitability. We and our customers or licensees also may experience component or software failures or defects which could require significant product recalls, reworks and/or repairs which are not covered by warranty reserves and which could consume a substantial portion of the capacity of our third-party manufacturers or those of our customers or licensees.

Our operating results are subject to substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations and to market downturns.

Our revenues, earnings and other operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and may fluctuate significantly in the future. General economic or other conditions causing a downturn in the market for our products or technology, affecting the timing of customer orders or causing cancellations or rescheduling of orders could also adversely affect our operating results. Moreover, our customers may change delivery schedules or cancel or reduce orders without incurring significant penalties and generally are not subject to minimum purchase requirements.

Our future operating results will be affected by many factors, including the following:


	•	the rate of CDMA technology deployment;

	•	delays in the adoption of 3G CDMA standards;

	•	changes in the growth rate of the wireless communications industry;

	•	consolidation in the wireless communications industry;

	•	strategic transactions, such as acquisitions, divestitures and investments, including investments in new ventures and CDMA carriers;

	•	the collectibility of our trade and finance receivables;

	•	changes in the fair values of our strategic equity and derivative investments;

	•	our ability to realize the fair values of our investments in thinly-traded public and private markets;

	•	the success of our strategic investments;

	•	the performance of our Vesper Holding subsidiary;

	•	our ability to retain existing or secure anticipated customers, licensees or orders, both domestically and internationally;

	•	the availability and cost of products and services from our third-party suppliers;

	•	our ability to develop, introduce and market new technology, products and services on a timely basis;

	•	foreign currency fluctuations, inflation and deflation;

	•	decreases in average selling prices for our products and our customers’ products that use our technology;

	•	decreases in demand for our products and our customers’ products that use our technology;

	•	intellectual property disputes and litigation;

	•	government regulations;

	•	product defects;

	•	changes in accounting standards or practices;

	•	changes to existing rules or practice regarding stock option accounting and taxation;

	•	management of inventory in response to shifts in market demand;

	•	energy blackouts and system failures;

	•	changes in the mix of technology and products developed, licensed, produced and sold; and

	•	seasonal customer demand.

The foregoing factors are difficult to forecast and these, as well as other factors, could harm our quarterly or annual operating results. If our operating results fail to meet the expectations of investment analysts or investors in any period, the market price of our common stock may decline.

Our industry is subject to intense competition that could result in declining average selling prices for our licensees’ products and our products, negatively affecting our revenues and operating results.

We currently face significant competition in our markets and expect that intense competition will continue. Competition in the telecommunications market is based on varying combinations including:


	•	comprehensiveness of product and technology solutions;

	•	manufacturing capability;

	•	scalability and the ability of the system solution to meet customers’ immediate and future network requirements;

	•	product performance and quality;

	•	design and engineering capabilities;

	•	compliance with industry standards;

	•	time to market;

	•	system cost; and

	•	customer support.

This competition has resulted and is expected to continue to result in declining average royalties for our licensed intellectual property and reduced average selling prices for our products and those of our customers and licensees. We anticipate that additional competitors will enter our markets as a result of growth opportunities in wireless telecommunications, the trend toward global expansion by foreign and domestic competitors, technological and public policy changes and relatively low barriers to entry in selected segments of the industry.

Our competitors include companies that promote non-CDMA technologies and companies that design competing CDMA integrated circuits, such as Nokia, Motorola, Philips, Ericsson, Texas Instruments, Intel, LSI Logic, Nortel, Samsung, Matsushita and Siemens, all of whom are our licensees with the exception of Intel. With respect to our OmniTRACS, TruckMAIL, OmniExpress, LINQ and OmniOne products and services, our existing competitors are aggressively pricing their products and services and could continue to do so in the future. In addition, these competitors are offering new value-added products and services similar in many cases to those we have developed or are developing. Emergence of new competitors, particularly those offering low cost terrestrial-based products and current as well as future satellite-based systems, may impact margins and intensify competition in new markets.

Many of these current and potential competitors have advantages over us, including:


	•	existing royalty-free cross-licenses to competing and emerging technologies;

	•	longer operating histories and presence in key markets;

	•	greater name recognition;

	•	access to larger customer bases; and

	•	greater financial, sales and marketing, manufacturing, distribution, technical and other resources than we have.

As a result of these factors, these competitors may be more successful than us. In addition, we anticipate additional competitors will enter the market for products based on 3G standards. These competitors may have more established relationships and distribution channels in markets not currently deploying wireless communications technology. These competitors also have established or may establish financial or strategic relationships among themselves or with our existing or potential customers, resellers or other third parties. These relationships may affect customers’ decisions to purchase products or license technology from us. Accordingly,

The stock market in general, and the stock prices of technology-based companies in particular, have experienced extreme volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of any specific public companies. The market price of our common stock has fluctuated in the past and is likely to fluctuate in the future as well. Factors that may have a significant impact on the market price of our stock include:


	•	announcements concerning us or our competitors, including the selection of wireless communications technology by cellular, PCS and Wireless Local Loop service providers and the timing of the roll-out of those systems;

	•	receipt of substantial orders for integrated circuits and system software products;

	•	quality deficiencies in services or products;

	•	announcements regarding financial developments or technological innovations;

	•	international developments, such as technology mandates, political developments or changes in economic policies;

	•	new commercial products;

	•	changes in recommendations of securities analysts;

	•	government regulations, including stock option accounting and tax regulations;

	•	acts of terrorism and war;

	•	proprietary rights or product or patent litigation;

	•	strategic transactions, such as acquisitions and divestitures; or

	•	rumors or allegations regarding our financial disclosures or practices.

Our future earnings and stock price may be subject to significant volatility, particularly on a quarterly basis. Shortfalls in our revenues or earnings in any given period relative to the levels expected by securities analysts could immediately, significantly and adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

Our industry is subject to rapid technological change that we must keep pace with to successfully compete.

New technological innovations generally require a substantial investment before they are commercially viable. We may make substantial, non-recoverable investments in new technologies that do not result in meaningful revenues.

The market for our products and technology is characterized by many factors, including:


	•	rapid technological advances and evolving industry standards;

	•	changes in customer requirements;

	•	frequent introductions of new products and enhancements; and

	•	evolving methods of building and operating telecommunications systems.

We are currently making significant investments in developing and introducing new products, such as:


	•	Integrated circuit products to support high-speed wireless Internet access and multimode, multi-band, multi-network products including cdmaOne, CDMA2000 1X/1xEV-DO, GSM/ GPRS, WCDMA and position location technologies; and


	•	Binary Runtime Environment for Wireless (BREW), a thin applications execution platform that provides applications developers with an open standard platform for wireless devices on which to develop their products.

Our future success will depend on our ability to continue to develop and introduce new products, technology and enhancements on a timely basis. Our future success will also depend on our ability to keep pace with technological developments, protect our intellectual property, satisfy varying customer requirements, price our products competitively and achieve market acceptance. The introduction of products embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards could render our existing products and technology, and products and technology currently under development, obsolete and unmarketable. If we fail to anticipate or respond adequately to technological developments or customer requirements, or experience any significant delays in development, introduction or shipment of our products and technology in commercial quantities, our competitive position could be damaged.

Consolidations in the wireless communications industry could adversely affect our business.

The wireless communications industry has experienced consolidation of participants, and this trend may continue. If wireless carriers consolidate with companies that utilize technologies that compete with CDMA, then CDMA may lose market share unless the surviving entity continues to deploy CDMA. This consolidation could also result in delays in purchasing decisions by the merged companies, negatively affecting our revenues and operating results.

The enforcement and protection of our intellectual property rights may be expensive and could divert our valuable resources.

We rely primarily on patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements and other methods, to protect our proprietary information, technologies and processes, including our patent portfolio. Policing unauthorized use of our products and technologies is difficult. We cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent the misappropriation or unauthorized use of our proprietary information and technologies, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as United States laws.

The vast majority of our patents and patent applications relate to our CDMA digital wireless communications technology and much of the remainder of our patents and patent applications relate to our gpsOne, BREW, OmniTRACS, Digital Cinema, Globalstar and Eudora products. Litigation may be required to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights of others. As a result of any such litigation, we could lose our proprietary rights or incur substantial unexpected operating costs. Any action we take to protect our intellectual property rights could be costly and could absorb significant management time and attention, which, in turn, could negatively impact our operating results. In addition, failure to protect our trademark rights could impair our brand identity.

Claims by third parties that we infringe their intellectual property or that patents on which we rely are invalid could adversely affect our business.

From time to time, companies may assert patent, copyright and other intellectual proprietary rights to our technologies or technologies used in our industry. These claims may result in our involvement in litigation. We may not prevail in such litigation given the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in intellectual property litigation. If any products incorporating our technology were found to infringe on protected technology, we could be required to redesign or license such technology and/or pay damages or other compensation to the infringed party. If we were unable to license protected technology used in our products, we could be prohibited from making and selling such products.

In addition, as the number of competitors in our market increases and the functionality of products incorporating our technology is enhanced and overlaps with the products of other companies, we may become subject to claims of infringement or misappropriation of the intellectual property rights of others. Any claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, divert the efforts of our technical

and management personnel or cause product shipment delays, any of which could have a material adverse effect upon our operating results. In any potential dispute involving our patents or other intellectual property, our licensees could also become the targets of litigation. This could trigger obligations on us that could result in substantial expenses. In addition to the time and expense required for us to comply with our obligations to our licensees, any such litigation could severely disrupt the business of our licensees, which in turn could hurt our relations with our licensees and cause our revenues to decrease.

A number of third parties have claimed to own patents essential to various proposed 3G CDMA standards. If we are required to obtain additional licenses and/or pay royalties to one or more patent holders, this could have a material adverse effect on the commercial implementation of our CDMA products and technologies and our profitability.

Third parties also may commence actions seeking to establish the invalidity of our patents. In the event that a third-party challenges a patent, a court may invalidate the patent or determine that the patent is not enforceable, which would harm our competitive position. If any of our key patents are invalidated, or if the scope of the claims in any of these patents is limited by court decision, we could be prevented from licensing the invalidated or limited portion of our technology and our licensees may be prevented from manufacturing and selling the products that incorporate such technology without obtaining a license to use a third-party’s technology. Even if a third-party challenge is not successful, it could be expensive and time consuming, divert management attention from our business and harm our reputation.

The high amount of capital required to obtain radio frequencies licenses could slow the growth of the wireless communications industry and adversely affect our business.

Our growth is dependent upon the increased use of wireless communications services that utilize our CDMA technology. In order to provide wireless communications services, carriers must obtain rights to use specific radio frequencies. The allocation of frequencies is regulated in the United States and other countries throughout the world and limited spectrum space is allocated to wireless communications services. Industry growth may be affected by the amount of capital required to obtain licenses to use new frequencies. Typically, governments sell these licenses at auctions. Over the last several years, the amount paid for these licenses has increased significantly, particularly for frequencies used in connection with 3G technology. In addition, litigation and disputes involving companies bidding to acquire spectrum has delayed the expansion of wireless networks in the United States, and it is possible that this delay could continue for a significant amount of time. The significant cost of licenses and delays associated with disputes over license auctions may slow the growth of the industry if service providers are unable to obtain or service the additional capital necessary to implement infrastructure to support 3G technology. Our growth could be adversely affected if this occurs.

Inflation has had and may continue to have adverse effects on the economies and securities markets of certain countries and could have adverse effects on our customers, licensees and the projects of CDMA carriers in those countries, including their ability to obtain financing and repay debts. Brazil and Mexico, for example, have periodically experienced relatively high rates of inflation and currency devaluation. Significant inflation or deflation could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, liquidity and financial position.

If we experience product liability claims or recalls, we may incur significant expenses and experience decreased demand for our products.

Testing, manufacturing, marketing and use of our products and those of our licensees and customers entails the risk of product liability. Although we believe our product liability insurance will be adequate to protect against product liability claims, we cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to maintain such insurance at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts to protect us against losses due to product liability. Our inability to maintain insurance at an acceptable cost or to otherwise protect against potential product liability claims could prevent or inhibit the commercialization of our products and those of our licensees and customers

Our business depends on the availability of satellite and other networks for our OmniTRACS, TruckMAIL, OmniExpress, LINQ and OmniOne systems and other communications products.

Our OmniTRACS and TruckMAIL systems currently operate in the United States market on leased Ku-band satellite transponders. Our data satellite transponder and position reporting satellite transponder lease runs through October 2006. Based on system capacity analysis, we believe that the United States OmniTRACS and TruckMAIL operations will not require additional transponder capacity through 2003. We believe that in the event additional transponder capacity would be required in fiscal 2003 or in future years, additional capacity will be available on acceptable terms. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to acquire additional transponder capacity on acceptable terms in a timely manner. A failure to maintain adequate satellite capacity would harm our business, operating results, liquidity and financial position.

Our OmniExpress, LINQ and OmniOne systems are terrestrial-based products and thus rely on various wireless terrestrial communications networks operated by third parties. We believe these terrestrial networks will be available for our products; however, we cannot assure you that these networks will continue to be available to us or that they will perform adequately for our needs. The unavailability or nonperformance of these network systems could harm our business.

Despite the implementation of security measures and the existence of a Disaster Recovery Plan for our internal information technology networking systems, our systems are vulnerable to damages from computer viruses, unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, war, and telecommunication failures. Any system failure, accident or security breach that causes interruptions in our operations could result in a material disruption to our business. To the extent that any disruption or security breach results in a loss or damage to our customers’ data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential information, we may incur liability as a result. In addition, we may incur additional costs to remedy the damages caused by these disruptions or security breaches.

Message transmissions for domestic OmniTRACS, TruckMAIL, OmniExpress, LINQ and OmniOne operations are formatted and processed at the Network Management Center in San Diego, California, which we operate, with a fully redundant backup Network Management Center located in Las Vegas, Nevada. Our Network Management Center operations are subject to system failures, which could interrupt the services and have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

From time to time, we install new or upgraded business management systems. To the extent such systems fail or are not properly implemented, we may experience material disruptions to our business that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We may need additional capital in the future, and such additional financing may not be available.

The design, development and commercialization of digital wireless communications technology and products are highly capital intensive. For example, we must have the ability to fund significant capital for our internal research and development efforts. In addition, terrestrial and satellite wireless system carriers increasingly have required long-term financing or equity. In particular, we have substantial debt and equity funding commitments to various CDMA carriers and strategic investees. In order to meet our financing needs, we may be required to raise additional funds from a combination of sources including potential debt or equity issuances. We cannot assure you that additional financing will be available on reasonable terms or at all.

Our products and those of our customers and licensees are subject to various Federal Communications Commission regulations in the United States and other international regulations. These regulations require

that these products meet certain radio frequency emission standards, not cause unallowable interference to other services, and in some cases accept interference from other services. We are also subject to government regulations and requirements of local standards bodies outside the United States, where we are less prominent than local competitors and have less opportunity to participate in the establishment of regulatory and standards policies. We are also subject to state and federal health, safety and environmental regulations, as well as regulations related to the handling of and access to classified information. Changes in the regulation of our activities, including changes in the allocation of available spectrum by the United States government and other governments, or exclusion of our technology by a standards body, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, liquidity and financial position.

If wireless handsets pose health and safety risks, we may be subject to new regulations, and demand for our products and those of our licensees and customers may decrease.

Media reports and various class action lawsuits have suggested that radio frequency emissions from wireless handsets may be linked to various health concerns, including cancer, and may interfere with various electronic medical devices, including hearing aids and pacemakers. Concerns over radio frequency emissions may have the effect of discouraging the use of wireless handsets, which would decrease demand for our products and those of our licensees and customers. In recent years, the FCC and foreign regulatory agencies have updated the guidelines and methods they use for evaluating radio frequency emissions from radio equipment, including wireless handsets. In addition, interest groups have requested that the FCC investigate claims that wireless communications technologies pose health concerns and cause interference with airbags, hearing aids and medical devices. There also are some safety risks associated with the use of wireless handsets while driving. Concerns over these safety risks and the effect of any legislation that may be adopted in response to these risks could reduce demand for our products and those of our licensees and customers in the United States as well as foreign countries.

Our business and operating results will be harmed if we are unable to manage growth in our business.

Since 1996, our businesses have experienced periods of rapid growth that have placed, and are expected to continue to place, significant demands on our managerial, operational and financial resources. In order to manage this growth, we must continue to improve and expand our management, operational and financial systems and controls, including quality control and delivery and service capabilities. We also need to continue to expand, train and manage our employee base. We must carefully manage research and development capabilities and production and inventory levels to meet product demand, new product introductions and product and technology transitions. We cannot assure you that we will be able to timely and effectively meet that demand and maintain the quality standards required by our existing and potential customers and licensees.

In addition, inaccuracies in our demand forecasts, or failure of the systems used to develop the forecasts, could quickly result in either insufficient or excessive inventories and disproportionate overhead expenses. If we ineffectively manage our growth or are unsuccessful in recruiting and retaining personnel, our business and operating results will be harmed.

We may not be able to attract and retain qualified personnel necessary for the design, development and commercialization of our products and technology.

Our future success depends largely upon the continued service of our Board members, executive officers and other key management and technical personnel. Our success also depends on our ability to continue to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. Our key technical personnel represent a significant asset, as the source of our technological and product innovations upon which our revenues are highly dependent. The competition for these personnel is intense in the wireless communications industry.

We may have particular difficulty attracting and retaining key personnel in periods of poor operating performance given the significant use of incentive compensation by our competitors. We do not have employment agreements with our key management personnel and do not maintain key person life insurance on

Future changes in financial accounting standards may cause adverse unexpected revenue fluctuations and affect our reported results of operations.

A change in accounting policies can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before a change is announced. New pronouncements and varying interpretations of pronouncements have occurred with frequency and may occur in the future. Changes to existing rules or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or the way we conduct our business.

Actual results may differ from estimates made in prior periods, causing adverse unexpected fluctuations affecting our reported financial results.

The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. By their nature, estimates are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. We base our estimates on historical and anticipated results and trends and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, including assumptions as to future events. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results that differ from our estimates could have a significant adverse effect on our operating results and financial position.

Our stockholder rights plan, certificate of incorporation and Delaware law could adversely affect the performance of our stock.

Our certificate of incorporation provides for cumulative voting in the election of directors. In addition, our certificate of incorporation provides for a classified board of directors and includes a provision that requires the approval of holders of at least 66 2/3% of our voting stock as a condition to a merger or certain other business transactions with, or proposed by, a holder of 15% or more of our voting stock. This approval is not required in cases where certain of our directors approve the transaction or where certain minimum price criteria and other procedural requirements are met. Our certificate of incorporation also requires the approval of holders of at least 66 2/3% of our voting stock to amend or change the provisions mentioned relating to the classified board, cumulative voting or the transaction approval. Under our bylaws, stockholders are not permitted to call special meetings of our stockholders. Finally, our certificate of incorporation provides that any action required or permitted to be taken by our stockholders must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting rather than by any consent in writing.

The classified board, transaction approval, special meeting and other charter provisions may discourage certain types of transactions involving an actual or potential change in our control. These provisions may also discourage certain types of transactions in which our stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices and may limit our stockholders’ ability to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interests.

Further, we have distributed a dividend of one right for each outstanding share of our common stock pursuant to the terms of our preferred share purchase rights plan. These rights will cause substantial dilution to the ownership of a person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by our board of directors and may have the effect of deterring hostile takeover attempts. In addition, our board of directors has the authority to fix the rights and preferences of and issue shares of preferred stock. This right may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in our control without action by our stockholders.

We are at risk of securities class action litigation that could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources.

In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. Due to the volatility of our stock price, we may be the target of securities litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources.

Financial market risks related to interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity prices are described in our 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We have fixed income securities consisting of cash equivalents and investments in marketable debt securities. During the second quarter of fiscal 2002, we allocated $300 million to institutional portfolio managers for investment in a diversified portfolio of non-investment grade securities, which are subject to a higher degree of default risk than our current fixed income portfolio, and at June 30, 2002, that amount was fully invested, primarily in corporate bonds with credit ratings of B/B2 and BB/Ba2. A portion of these bonds are designated as trading securities. The following table provides comparative information about our fixed income securities including principal cash flows, weighted average yield and contractual maturity dates:

We consolidate all assets and liabilities of the Vesper Operating Companies, including bank loans and capital lease commitments. Bank loans totaled $80 million at June 30, 2002, of which $20 million is payable in fiscal 2005 and $60 million is payable in fiscal 2006. The bank loans bear interest at variable rates, based on the Certificate of Deposit Inter Bank (CDI) rate (the LIBOR rate equivalent in Brazil) plus 1.5%. Capital lease commitments totaled $45 million at June 30, 2002. The aggregate maturities on the capital lease commitments over the next four years from fiscal 2002 through 2005 are $5 million, $15 million, $12 million, and $13 million, respectively. The capital lease commitments bear interest at fixed interest rates, ranging from 11.25% to 14.5%. The fair values of bank loans and capital lease commitments will change as interest rates change. Interest expense will be affected by changes in the CDI.

We are exposed to foreign exchange risk related to our consolidation of the Vesper Operating Companies. We report our financial statements in U.S. dollars. The Vesper Operating Companies account for the majority of their transactions in Brazilian real, and their results are translated into U.S. dollars during and at the end of the fiscal quarter. In addition, the Vesper Operating Companies capital lease commitments are denominated in U.S. dollars. As a result, a significant change in the value of the U.S. dollar against the Brazilian real could have a material effect on the Vesper Operating Companies and on us. A significant devaluation of the Brazilian real has occurred in the past and may occur again the future.

We hold marketable securities and derivative instruments subject to equity price risk. The recorded values of marketable securities increased to $1,189 million at June 30, 2002 from $859 million at

September 30, 2001. As of June 30, 2002, one equity position constituted approximately 12% of the fair value of the marketable securities portfolio. The recorded value of derivative instruments subject to FAS 133 at June 30, 2002 is $4 million. We generally invest in companies in the high-technology industry, and typically do not attempt to reduce or eliminate our market exposure on these securities. The portfolio’s concentrations in specific companies and industry segments may vary over time, and changes in concentrations may affect the portfolio’s price volatility.

At June 30, 2002, there had been no other material changes to the market risks described at September 30, 2001. Additionally, we do not anticipate any other near-term changes in the nature of our market risk exposures or in management’s objectives and strategies with respect to managing such exposures.

A review of the Company’s current litigation is disclosed in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies.” We are also engaged in other legal actions arising in the ordinary course of our business and believe that the ultimate outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial position.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	QUALCOMM Incorporated

	/s/ WILLIAM E. KEITEL

	William E. Keitel
	Senior Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer


Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		95-3685934 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

5775 Morehouse Dr., San Diego, California (Address of principal executive offices)		92121-1714 (Zip Code)


Class	Number of Shares

Common Stock, $0.0001 per share par value		777,143,936


PART I.FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	ITEM 1.CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
		CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
		CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
		CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
		NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
	ITEM 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
PART II.OTHER INFORMATION
	ITEM 1.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
	ITEM 2.CHANGES IN SECURITIES
	ITEM 3.DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
	ITEM 4.SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
	ITEM 5.OTHER INFORMATION
	ITEM 6.EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT 10.50
EXHIBIT 10.51


			Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets		3
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations		4
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		5
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		6 – 20
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition		21 – 49
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		49 – 50

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		51
	Item 2.	Changes in Securities		51
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		51
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		51
	Item 5.	Other Information		51
	Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K		51 – 52


			June 30,			September 30,
			2002			2001*

Current assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	1,280,876		$	1,388,602
	Marketable securities			1,098,912			894,577
	Accounts receivable, net			548,095			517,557
	Finance receivables, net			3,363			10,345
	Inventories, net			79,659			95,863
	Other current assets			171,624			147,814

		Total current assets		3,182,529			3,054,758
Marketable securities				445,667			297,333
Finance receivables, net				778,042			674,391
Other investments				293,110			245,220
Property, plant and equipment, net				742,862			431,396
Goodwill, net				408,756			585,046
Other assets				441,249			381,589

		Total assets	$	6,292,215		$	5,669,733

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
	Trade accounts payable		$	142,037		$	106,433
	Payroll and other benefits related liabilities			102,745			117,795
	Unearned revenue			201,934			184,461
	Other current liabilities			124,205			112,300

		Total current liabilities		570,921			520,989
Unearned revenue				254,191			295,005
Other liabilities				146,893			35,437

		Total liabilities		972,005			851,431

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 2, 3 and 7)
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries				74,748			5,887

Stockholders’ equity:
	Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value			—			—
	Common stock, $0.0001 par value			78			76
	Paid-in capital			4,898,420			4,791,559
	Retained earnings			414,342			244,947
	Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(67,378	)		(224,167	)

		Total stockholders’ equity		5,245,462			4,812,415

		Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	6,292,215		$	5,669,733



		Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended

		June 30,			July 1,			June 30,			July 1,
		2002			2001*			2002			2001*

Revenues		$	770,917		$	656,598		$	2,165,674		$	2,028,955

Operating expenses:
	Cost of revenues		288,162			235,931			825,273			793,699
	Research and development		118,086			107,414			341,709			299,790
	Selling, general and administrative		152,072			104,175			376,797			271,411
	Amortization of goodwill and other acquisition-related intangible assets		65,024			65,100			192,437			191,469
	Asset impairment and related (credits) charges		—			(653	)		—			472,030
	Other		8,955			(5,855	)		8,955			63,333

Total operating expenses			632,299			506,112			1,745,171			2,091,732

Operating income (loss)			138,618			150,486			420,503			(62,777	)
Interest expense			(8,639	)		16			(17,357	)		(10,069	)
Investment expense, net			(184,123	)		(39,906	)		(171,098	)		(237,799	)
Other			—			(119,862	)		—			(176,428	)

(Loss) income before income taxes and accounting changes			(54,144	)		(9,266	)		232,048			(487,073	)
Income tax benefit (expense)			40,376			(184,250	)		(62,653	)		1,990

(Loss) income before accounting changes			(13,768	)		(193,516	)		169,395			(485,083	)
Accounting changes, net of tax			—			—			—			(17,937	)

Net (loss) income		$	(13,768	)	$	(193,516	)	$	169,395		$	(503,020	)

Basic net (loss) earnings per common share:
	(Loss) income before accounting changes	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.26	)	$	0.22		$	(0.65	)
	Accounting changes, net of tax		—			—			—			(0.02	)

	Net (loss) income	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.26	)	$	0.22		$	(0.67	)

Diluted net (loss) earnings per common share:
	(Loss) income before accounting changes	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.26	)	$	0.21		$	(0.65	)
	Accounting changes, net of tax		—			—			—			(0.02	)

	Net (loss) income	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.26	)	$	0.21		$	(0.67	)

Shares used in per share calculations:
	Basic		773,127			758,050			768,663			754,055

	Diluted		773,127			758,050			809,169			754,055


												Reconciling
		QCT		QTL		QWI			QSI			Items			Total

For the three months ended:
June 30, 2002
	Revenues	$	404,253	$	198,853	$	109,581		$	49,456		$	8,774		$	770,917
	EBT		117,524		174,450		(3,074	)		(285,454	)		(57,590	)		(54,144	)
July 1, 2001
	Revenues	$	333,115	$	180,129	$	103,742		$	—		$	39,612		$	656,598
	EBT		70,582		152,890		5,101			(185,812	)		(52,027	)		(9,266	)
For the nine months ended:
June 30, 2002
	Revenues	$	1,107,212	$	603,611	$	329,140		$	92,262		$	33,449		$	2,165,674
	EBT		282,189		534,673		(8,271	)		(409,241	)		(167,302	)		232,048
July 1, 2001
	Revenues	$	1,027,806	$	592,599	$	313,826		$	—		$	94,724		$	2,028,955
	EBT		239,628		533,692		29,081			(989,681	)		(299,793	)		(487,073	)


	Three Months
	Ended			Nine Months Ended

	July 1,			June 30,		July 1,
	2001			2002		2001

Revenues	$	687,128		$	2,185,512	$	2,123,905

Net (loss) income	$	(239,220	)	$	145,464	$	(761,908	)

Basic (loss) earnings per common share	$	(0.32	)	$	0.19	$	(1.01	)

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share	$	(0.32	)	$	0.18	$	(1.01	)


Long-term financing under Ericsson arrangement (excluding Pegaso)			$	368
Senior credit facility with Leap Wireless				125
Pegaso:
	Commitment to acquire long-term financing to be provided by Ericsson			105
	Additional interim funding			89
	Other			5
Equity investments:
	Inquam			49
	Other			32
Other debt commitments				13

		Total debt and equity commitments		786
Long-term purchase commitments				72
Operating leases				136
Other				3

		Total	$	997


																				No Single
		2002			2003			2004			2005			2006			Thereafter			Maturity			Total		Fair Value


		(Dollars in millions)
June 30, 2002:
	Fixed income securities	$	164		$	267		$	370		$	103		$	34		$	283		$	174		$	1,395	$	1,401
	Interest rate		4.6	%		4.3	%		4.3	%		4.0	%		6.9	%		9.1	%		3.8	%
September 30, 2001:
	Fixed income securities	$	281		$	379		$	220		$	15		$	19		$	—		$	121		$	1,035	$	1,044
	Interest rate		6.4	%		4.6	%		5.0	%		5.0	%		4.9	%					4.4	%


	2.1			Restructuring Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2001, by and among the Company, Vesper Sao Paulo S.A., Vesper S.A., Vesper Holding Sao Paulo S.A., Vesper Holding S.A., VeloCom Cayman Brasil Holdings, QUALCOMM do Brasil Ltda., Bell Canada International (Brazil Telecom I) Limited, Bell Canada International (Megatel) Limited, VeloCom Inc., Nortel Networks Limited, Lucent Technologies Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ.), Harris Corporation, VeloCom do Brasil Ltda., Vesper Sao Paulo Cayman and Vesper Holding, Ltd.(1)
	2.2			The Subscription and Shareholders Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2001, by and among the Company, VeloCom Inc., Bell Canada International (Brazil Telecom I) Limited, Bell Canada International (Megatel) Limited, Bell Canada International (Espelho Sul) Limited, Nortel Networks Limited, Lucent Technologies Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ.), Harris Corporation and Vesper Holding, Ltd.(1)
	3.1			Restated Certificate of Incorporation.(2)
	3.2			Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation.(3)(4)
	3.3			Certificate of Designation of Preferences.(5)
	3.4			Bylaws.(6)
	3.5			Amendment of the Bylaws.(7)
	10.50			Amended and Restated Interim Funding Agreement, dated as of April 26, 2002, by and among the Company, Pegaso Comunicaciones y Sistemas, S. A. de C. V. and the other members of the Borrower Group and consented and agreed to and acknowledged by Telefonaktiebolaget L.M. Ericsson (Publ), ABN Amro Bank N.V. and Alcatel.


	10.51			Amendment No. 5 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of April 26, 2002, by and among the Company, Pegaso Comunicaciones y Sistemas S.A. de C.V., the other members of the Borrower Group, Telefonaktiebolaget L.M. Ericsson (Publ) and ABN Amro Bank N.V.


(1)	Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on November 28, 2001.

(2)	Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-62724).

(3)	Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 27, 1994, as amended.

(4)	Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 23, 1999.

(5)	Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 29, 1996.

(6)	Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-42782).

(7)	Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 1997.


		June 30,		September 30,
		2002		2001


		(in thousands)
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $86,246 and $15,756, respectively		$	518,794	$	493,930
Long-term contracts:
	Billed		23,061		11,917
	Unbilled		1,651		3,846
Other			4,589		7,864

		$	548,095	$	517,557


	June 30,		September 30,
	2002		2001


	(in thousands)
Raw materials	$	19,460	$	18,251
Work-in-process		3,294		3,346
Finished goods		56,905		74,266

	$	79,659	$	95,863


	June 30,			September 30,
	2002			2001


	(in thousands)
Land	$	43,383		$	38,093
Buildings and improvements		294,334			280,851
Computer equipment		364,314			283,293
Machinery and equipment		461,882			176,300
Furniture and office equipment		36,817			16,393
Leasehold improvements		48,620			44,990

		1,249,350			839,920
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(506,488	)		(408,524	)

	$	742,862		$	431,396